Category Archives: Bill Windsor

Bill Windsor has filed a lawsuit against Claudine Dombrowski, the American Mothers Political Party, and its members

2013-07-17-Kansas-Topeka-Shawnee-County-Courthouse (1)-640w

Bill Windsor has filed a lawsuit against the American Mothers Political Party and its members, including Claudine Dombrowski, Lorraine Tipton, Jennifer Dotson, Shannon E. Miller, Kimberly Wigglesworth, Connie Bedwell, and Loryn Ryder.  The lawsuit was filed in the District Court of Shawnee County in Topeka, Kansas.  Tipton (Wisconsin), Dotson (Florida), Miller (Mississippi), Wigglesworth (Connecticut), Bedwell (California), and Ryder (Ohio) will all have to come to Kansas to participate.  I expect to  name many others since I sued these people and 1,000 Jane Does and John Does.

13C-1045-Windsor-v-AMPP-Verified-Petition-2013-09-12

COUNT I – DEFAMATION

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. In Kansas, the elements of defamation, both libel and slander, are: (1) false and defamatory words (2) communicated to a third person (3) which result in harm to the reputation of the person defamed.  An organization may be liable for the defamatory utterances of its agent which are made while acting within the scope of her authority.
  3. Defendants have published false and defamatory words about the Plaintiff. [Element 1.]  Published statements were false.  Many statements are mentioned above and may be seen in exhibits.  The Plaintiff believes much more will surface in discovery.
  4. Statements that Defendants have published were communicated to third persons. [Element 2.]  Many statements have been published online for the world to see.
  5. Statements made by Defendants have harmed the reputation of Plaintiff and have lowered him in the estimation of the community or to defer third persons from associating or dealing with him.  [Element 3.]  Many people have ceased dealing with the Plaintiff because of the statements.
  6. Defendants know the difference between what’s true and what’s a lie.  They know about laws to protect people from libel, slander, defamation, harassment, and stalking, but they acted anyway.  They had a duty to abide by the law, and they didn’t ignore it once; the laws were ignored again and again and again.
  7. The Plaintiff suffered damage as a result of statements by Defendants. The Plaintiff has lost his wife, his relationship with his children, and any contact whatsoever with his grandchildren.  He has lost his home.  His movie project has been severely hurt by what the Defendants have done.  His reputation has been tarnished almost beyond belief.  The Plaintiff has incurred costs and lost money as a result of the actions of the Defendants.

COUNT II – DEFAMATION PER SE

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. Statements made by Defendants impute the commission of crimes or acts that constitute an indictable offense.  Many statements made have accused the Plaintiff of criminal acts.
  3. Many statements made by Defendants impute fraud, misconduct, or incompetence in the Plaintiff’s business or occupation.
  4. Statements made by Defendants tend to harm the reputation of Plaintiff and to lower him in the estimation of the community or to defer third persons from associating or dealing with him.  Many people have ceased dealing with the Plaintiff because of the statements.
  5. Statements made by the Defendants were defamatory as a matter of law.

COUNT III – OUTRAGE AND INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. The tort of outrage or intentional infliction of emotional distress has four elements: (1) The conduct of defendant must be intentional or in reckless disregard of plaintiff; (2) the conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (3) there must be a causal connection between defendant’s conduct and plaintiff’s mental distress; and (4) plaintiff’s mental distress must be extreme and severe.
  3. Defendants intentionally or negligently inflicted emotional distress on the Plaintiff.  Defendants acted intentionally or recklessly. [Element 1.]  Defendants know the difference between what’s true and what’s a lie.  They know about laws to protect people from libel, slander, defamation, harassment, and stalking, but they acted anyway.  They had a duty to abide by the law, the they didn’t ignore it once, the laws were ignored again and again and again.
  4. Conduct of Defendants was extreme and outrageous. [Element 2.]  These outrageously false, criminal claims would prompt an average member of the community to exclaim “outrageous!”
  5. The conduct of Defendants caused the distress. [Element 3.]
  6. The distress caused was severe emotional distress to the Plaintiff.  [Element 4.]  The outrageous lies, libel, slander, and defamation are bad alone, but the effect on the Plaintiff’s life with the loss of his wife, his family, his home, and life as he knew it has caused severe emotional distress.

COUNT IV – NEGLIGENCE

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. Defendants were negligent.  Negligence is the failure to exercise the degree of care which a reasonably prudent and careful person would use under the same or similar circumstances.
  3. The elements of a negligence claim are (1) The existence of a duty on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury of which he complains; (2) an act or omission in breach of that duty, (3) An injury to the plaintiff from such failure of the defendant, and (4) an injury.
  4. The Defendants had a duty to abide by the laws regarding defamation, cyberstalking, harassment, libel, slander, and they ignored that duty.  Harm was clearly forseeable.  Duty, the obligation of one person to another, flows from millennia of social customs, philosophy, and religion. Serving as the glue of society, duty is the thread that binds humans to one another in community. Duty constrains and channels behavior in a socially responsible way.  The Defendants did not behave in a socially responsible way.  Their actions were totally irresponsible.
  5. There is a standard of proper behavior necessary to avoid imposing undue risks of harm to other persons and their property, and the Defendants breached their duty.  They ignored the behavior necessary to avoid harming the Plaintiff.  They thumbed their noses at the law and the Plaintiff with one blatant slanderous statement after another.  The Defendants had a duty to act with reasonable care for the safety the Plaintiff.  The Defendants acted carelessly, unreasonably, without due care.  The Defendants breached the duty of care, and their conduct was negligent.
  6. The damages the Plaintiff suffers are a proximate result of the Defendants’ breach of duty.  The Defendants must be required to compensate the Plaintiff for harm improperly inflicted.  How do you compensate the Plaintiff for the loss of his wife, his children, and his grandchildren?  As much as money damages can do so, the law requires the Defendants to restore what the Plaintiff lost as a proximate result of the Defendants’ wrongs.
  7. The Plaintiff has been caused pain and suffering, emotional distress, lost enjoyment of life, loss of his marriage, loss of his relationship with his family, loss of his home, severe damage to his reputation, damage to his career, and more.

COUNT V – TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT

OR BUSINESS RELATIONS

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. Tortious interference with a contract or business expectancy requires proof of: (1) a contract or valid business relationship; (2) defendant’s knowledge of the contract or relationship; (3) a breach induced or caused by defendant’s intentional interference; (4) absence of justification; and (5) damages resulting therefrom.
  3. The Plaintiff was involved in a valid business relationship. [Element 1.]  The Defendants knew that the Plaintiff had a valid business relationship with people all over America in filming videos, conducting interviews, and producing a movie.  Several of the Defendants signed a contract with the Plaintiff, and they were aware that everyone filmed by the Plaintiff signed the same contract.
  4. Defendants were aware of the relationship. [Element 2.]  The Defendants were totally aware of the business relationship that the Plaintiff has had with thousands of people.
  5. Defendants intentionally interfered with the relationship. [Element 3.]  Defendants know the difference between what’s true and what’s a lie.  They know about laws to protect people from libel, slander, defamation, harassment, and stalking, but they acted anyway.  They had a duty to abide by the law, the they didn’t ignore it once, the laws were ignored again and again and again.  They took actions to damage the Plaintiff’s business relationships.
  6. Defendants acted without justification. [Element 4.]  There can never be a justification for lies, libel, slander, harassment, defamation, and false criminal charges.
  7. The Plaintiff suffered damages as a direct result of conduct of Defendants. [Element 5.]  Many people have dropped out of the Plaintiff’s projects.  Very few people contact the Plaintiff now while many thousands did before this.  The Plaintiff had over 50,000 followers on Facebook before this, and now he has less than 100.  The Defendants caused this.

COUNT VI – FALSE LIGHT INVASION OF PRIVACY

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. The right to privacy is invaded when there is (1) publication of some kind is made to a third party; (2) the publication  falsely represents the person; and (3) that representation is highly offensive to a reasonable person.  This is a cause of action based upon injury to plaintiff’s emotions and his mental suffering.
  3. Defendants have given publicity to matters concerning the Plaintiff.
  4. Defendants have invaded the Plaintiff’s privacy.  The Plaintiff’s name has been misappropriated as has the name of his deceased parents.  The Plaintiff’s photos and intellectual property have been misappropriated many times.
  5. Private facts about the Plaintiff have been publicly disclosed, and totally false personal information has been publicly disclosed.  Facts disclosed include alleged sex life, alleged criminal activity, alleged failure to pay taxes, alleged pedophilia, and much more.  There is an absolutely false article on Business Week’s website posted by Dombrowski that claims the Plaintiff is a sexual deviant.  The Plaintiff’s personal photos, photos of family members, as well as photos and alleged photos of his family have been published to damage the Plaintiff and in violation of his privacy and intellectual property rights. The matters publicized would be offensive to a reasonable person.  The disclosures have humiliated the Plaintiff.
  6. The Plaintiff has been portrayed in an absolutely false light to the public.

COUNT VII – CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT DEFAMATION

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. The elements for civil conspiracy under Kansas law are: (1) Two or more persons; (2) an object to be accomplished; (3) a meeting of minds on the object or course of action; (4) one or more unlawful overt acts; and (5) damages as the proximate result thereof.
  3. Defendants conspired to defame the Plaintiff.
  4. Defendants formed and operated the conspiracy.  The object to be accomplished was to defame, libel, slander, harass, cyberstalk, falsely charge the Plaintiff with felonies, cause emotional distress, and damage the Plaintiff.  Evidence shows that Defendants had a meeting of the minds and actively worked together toward this objective.
  5. Multiple overt acts were committed.  A substantial act or substantial effect from the conspiracy occurred in Kansas.  Defendants knew of the acts to be committed in Kansas and the impact in Kansas of acts done elsewhere in furtherance of the conspiracy.  The act in, and effect on, Kansas was a direct and foreseeable result of the conduct in furtherance of the conspiracy.
  6. Damage resulted to the Plaintiff from acts done in furtherance of the common design.  The Plaintiff has been caused pain and suffering, emotional distress, lost enjoyment of life, loss of his marriage, loss of his relationship with his family, loss of his home, severe damage to his reputation, damage to his career, and more.  The Plaintiff’s business relationships have been severely damaged.  The Plaintiff’s reputation is now sullied by a massive amount of absolutely false, defamatory information online.  This defamation likely can never be erased because it is breeding in cyberspace.

PUNITIVE DAMAGES

45.          The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.

46.          The Defendants acted intentionally to damage the Plaintiff.  This isn’t the case of someone slipping up and making one false statement.  The actions of the Defendants were deliberate.  Defendants’ conduct as described above is willful, wanton, wicked, intentional, and malicious resulting from fraud, insult, and malice, and it is associated with aggravating circumstances, including willfulness, wantonness, malice, oppression, outrageous conduct, insult, and fraud, thus warranting the Plaintiff’s recovery of punitive damages from the Defendants, to be determined by the trier of fact.  The Plaintiff should receive an award of punitive damages.  Exemplary damages serve to provide the claimant with recovery above and beyond compensatory damages in order to punish the wrongdoer for egregious conduct and to deter the wrongdoer and others from similar conduct in the future. Since the Plaintiff’s damages can never be erased in this case; there is no amount of money that could compensate the Plaintiff for the loss of the loves of his life, his wife, children, and grandchildren; there is no amount of money to compensate a decent, honest, law-abiding citizen for the destruction of his reputation.

JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff demands a jury trial.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that the Defendants be cited to appear and answer, and that on final trial, Plaintiff has the following:

  1. Judgment against Defendants for economic, pecuniary, lost profits, consequential, and incidental damages;
  2. By reason of Defendants’ knowing and intentional conduct, mental anguish damages in an amount within the jurisdictional limits of the Court;
  3. Prejudgment interest as provided by law;
  4. Exemplary and punitive damages appropriate to deter any future willful conduct;
  5. Attorney’s fees;
  6. Costs of suit;
  7. Post-judgment interest as provided by law;
  8. An Order that Defendants remove all false information regarding Plaintiff from the Internet;
  9. An Order that Defendants retract all false statements made by Defendants regarding Plaintiff;
  10. An Order that Defendants cease all false statements regarding Plaintiff; and
  11. Such other and further relief to which Plaintiff may be justly entitled.

Submitted this 12th day of September, 2013,

_________________________

William M. Windsor

For more information, see:

Ellis County Texas — Ellis County Texas Corruption — Ellis County Texas District Attorney Patrick Wilson — Ellis County Texas Jail — Ellis County Texas Judge Bob Carroll — Ellis County Mafia — Ellis County Texas Sheriff Johnny Brown — Joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com — Lawless AmericaMissoula County Judge John W. LarsonMontana MafiaTexas Extradition Law — University of Montana EmployeeJoeyisalittlekid — Albert FioriniAllie OverstreetAmerican Mothers Political Party — Betsi BixbyBrandy OwenBrannon BridgeBrenda WilliamsonCarrie WaltersCasey P. HargroveCheryl SosbyClaudine DombrowskiClyde HargroveConnie BedwellCurtis W. ButlerDale TrowbridgeDavid HargroveDeanna KloostraDeborah ParksDiane GochinGail LakritzHargrove Real EstateJay HoskinsJennifer DotsonKathy A. CarrollKC HargroveKellie McDougaldKimberly WigglesworthKinley HardinL WilsonLorraine TiptonLoryn RyderMadeline HargroveMark SupanichMary BagnaschiMegan Van ZelfdenMelanie WhiteMichelle StilipecMorgan HargroveNancy RolfeRenee HarringtonSam RoundSean D. FlemingShannon MillerShonda HargroveSid Wallingford GrayStacy EmersonTrinity Baker

Contact Bill Windsor at Bill@BillWindsor.com — www.LawlessAmerica.com — www.facebook.com/billwindsor1www.youtube.com/lawlessamerica — www.imdb.com/title/tt2337260/ — www.LawlessAmerica.org — www.twitter.com/lawlessamerica

LEGAL NOTICE TO ALL ASSOCIATED IN ANY MANNER WITH THE AMERICAN MOTHERS POLITICAL PARTY — MEMBERS, FRIENDS, ASSOCIATES, LIKES, ETC.

ampp-SlashCircle_svg-320w
LEGAL NOTICE TO ALL ASSOCIATED IN ANY MANNER WITH THE AMERICAN MOTHERS POLITICAL PARTY — MEMBERS, FRIENDS, ASSOCIATES, LIKES, ETC.YOU HAVE BEEN SUED.

DO NOT DELETE (WITHOUT MAINTAINING A COPY FOR LEGAL PRODUCTION) ANYTHING THAT YOU HAVE POSTED, EMAILED, OR PUBLISHED IN ANY MANNER ABOUT BILL WINDSOR, LAWLESS AMERICA, OR ANYONE ASSOCIATED IN ANY MANNER WITH BILL WINDSOR OR LAWLESS AMERICA.

Should you delete anything without maintaining a copy for legal production, I believe you will be guilty of the crime of destroying evidence. I will get a court order to have your electronic devices analyzed by a computer forensics expert, so we will be able to prove what you deleted and when.

Kansas law is great. Those of you who have posted on American Mothers Political Party web pages, have liked their Facebook page, etc. will get to come to Topeka Kansas to defend yourselves in my lawsuit against you. I cannot wait.

William M. Windsor
nobodies@att.net
Phone: 770-578-1094
www.LawlessAmerica.org – blog site
www.LawlessAmerica.com
www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica2
www.facebook.com/billwindsor1
www.youtube.com/lawlessamerica
www.imdb.com/title/tt2337260/

Bill Windsor of Lawless America puts Claudine Dombrowski and the American Mothers Political Party out of the stalking and threat business

Kansas-Wichita-Lawless-America-Movie-2012-10-30 290-cropped-square-200w

Bill Windsor of Lawless America puts Claudine Dombrowski and the American Mothers Political Party out of the stalking and threat business.

I haven’t wanted to telegraph my visit to the Shawnee County Courthouse in Topeka Kansas today. Today was the trial of Claudine Dombrowski on stalking charges. Case 13D-1747.

Claudine Dombrowski has been ordered to post nothing about me and remove all postings in regard to me. I doubt that Claudine Dombrowski can comply with the order, so I believe she is destined for criminal charges and contempt charges.

If she has a weapon, I believe she is restricted and may lose it. She could also be prosecuted for interstate travel to commit stalking or violence and interstate stalking.

There was another Claudine Dombrowski victim at the trial, and she is even happier than I am. Others will likely be following with actions similar to mine.

Since Claudine Dombrowski IS the American Mothers Political Party, it seems to me that their Facebook pages and web pages will have to disappear. I hereby advise them to make copies of everything they remove as these are subject to subpoena in both civil and criminal matters that are pending. All the Muthas must heed this requirement, or they could be found guilty of the crime of destroying evidence.  See the LEGAL NOTICE TO ALL STALKERS, CYBERSTALKERS, AND ANYONE WHO HAS EVER POSTED ANYTHING ABOUT ME.

Claudine Dombrowski has been effectively muzzled by Shawnee County Kansas Judge C. William Ossmann. Claudine Dombrowski and her so-called American Mothers Political Party can no longer post anything about Bill Windsor; must remove ALL postings online about Bill Windsor; must not follow, harass, telephone, contact, post online, or otherwise communicate with Bill Windsor; must not abuse, molest, or interfere with Bill Windsor’s privacy rights; must not contact Bill Windsor directly or indirectly; must not enter or come on or around the premises, residence, workplace where Bill Windsor resides, stays, or works (to include anywhere that Bill Windsor films); must comply with Kansas law regarding possession of weapons by one who has been found to have committed stalking; and must comply with federal firearm restrictions.

Judge Ossmann stated in the order that violation of the order could result in the order being extended for up to the lifetime of Claudine Dombrowski!  I’d put the odds of that at about 90%.

By the way, this order states that it is effective as of the date and time filed — September 12, 2013 at 2:30 pm. So, if anyone sees anything negative posted about me by anyone or any site — or any use of my name whatsoever by anyone with the American Mothers Political Party, please send me screen shots as every use will be a violation of the court order and should be considered a crime.

William M. Windsor
nobodies@att.net
Phone: 770-578-1094
www.LawlessAmerica.org – blog site
www.LawlessAmerica.com
www.facebook.com/lawlessamerica2
www.facebook.com/billwindsor1
www.youtube.com/lawlessamerica
www.imdb.com/title/tt2337260/

13D-1747-Windsor-v-Dombrowski-Order-PROTECTIVE-ORDER-2013-09-12

Death Threat linked to Claudine Dombrowski and American Mothers Political Party

Texas-death-chamber-200w

Death Threat linked to Claudine Dombrowski and American Mothers Political Party.

The post shown below off the American Mothers Political Party Facebook page is dated February 2, 2013.  It declares Curtis Butler of Joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com to be a “new friend” of the American Mothers Political Party, which we know is Claudien Dombrowski and a band of really sick women.

Curtis Butler is the self-admitted alcoholic who drinks Everclear straight from the bottle and recently recorded a YouTube video in which he threatens physical harm to Bill Windsor.  In my opinion, it is a death threat.

So, here we have Claudine Dombrowski’s friend making a death threat to me.

AMPP-CURTIS-BUTLER-2013-02-02-5-06-pm-new-friend

I intend to hold every member or supporter of the American Mothers Political Party liable for all the defamation, lies, slander, libel, and threats.  Every single one of these witches.

 

Claudine Dombrowski appears to be spending a LOT of time on this website reading about the charges against her

Kansas-Wichita-Claudine-Dombrowski-Lawless-America-Movie-2012-10-30 293-cropped-640w

Claudine Dombrowski appears to be spending a LOT of time on this website reading about the charges against her.

We have a Traffic Manager program installed here that enables us to track the IP addresses of the actual location where the user is located.

Surprise, surprise, lengthy time has come from TOPEKA!

 

 

Bill Windsor files a Sworn Affidavit in support of his Supplement to his Amended Verified Petition for Ex Parte Protective Order against Claudine Dombrowski

2013-07-17-Kansas-Topeka-Shawnee-County-Courthouse (1)-640w

Bill Windsor files a Sworn Affidavit in support of his Supplement to his Amended Verified Petition for Ex Parte Protective Order against Claudine Dombrowski.  Exhibits are provided as links at the bottom of the page.

SWORN AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM M. WINDSOR

I, William M. Windsor, the undersigned, hereby declare under penalty of perjury:

  1. I am over the age of 21, am competent to testify, and have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein.  I provide this affidavit to be used in this matter and in any other legal proceeding.
  2. I failed to include Exhibit 5 with the AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER filed on July 26.  It is attached hereto as Exhibit 5.
  3. I failed to include one document in Exhibit 6 with the AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER filed on July 26.  It is attached hereto as Exhibit 6A.
  4. I failed to include Exhibit 8 with the AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER filed on July 26.  It is attached hereto as Exhibit 8.  This exhibit is information posted on the American Mothers Political Party Facebook page.  Page 4 shows one mention of watching the movie “Kill Bill.”  The members of the organization were encouraged to watch it.  This document is filled with many other defamatory published statements.  DOMBROWSKI has published that she and she alone is responsible for everything on this website.  This is shown in Exhibit 47 hereto.
  5. I failed to include Exhibit 9 with the AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER filed on July 26.  It is attached hereto as Exhibit 9.
  6. I failed to include some documents with Exhibit 10 with the AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER filed on July 26.  It is attached hereto as Exhibit 10A.  Sean Boushie has stalked me by email, Facebook messages and posts, by mail, and through published information online.  He has threatened me in many ways.  He uses lewd language and is continually telling me to go fuck myself.  He publishes information online pretending to be me, and he uses aliases including John Smith and John Brown.  He sends me emails showing the email address as killbill@yahoo.com and gofuckyourself@yahoo.com.  He is associated with DOMBROWSKI and the American Mothers Political Party as well as with Joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com.
  7. I failed to include Exhibit 19 with the AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER filed on July 26.  It is attached hereto as Exhibit 19.  This exhibit shows some of DOMBROWSKI’S websites.  She stalks and defames a number of local attorneys, doctors, and social workers by setting up websites in their names.  Note that she publishes all of their personal information – name, address, phone, email, and more.  These websites were set up before she and her organization and associates began stalking me.  It demonstrates a pattern and practice of wrongful behavior by DOMBROWSKI.  Page 1 of Exhibit 19 is the website about Dr. David C. Rodeheffer.  Page 2 of Exhibit 19 is the website about Dr. Milfred ‘Bud’ Dale.  Page 3 of Exhibit 19 is the website about Christopher Dykes.  Page 4 of Exhibit 19 is the website about Kara Haney.  Page 5 of Exhibit 19 is one of several websites about Rene Netherton.  Page 6 of Exhibit 19 is the website about Donald R. Hoffman.  Page 7 of Exhibit 19 is the website about Drex Flott.  Page 8 of Exhibit 19 is a website about Jill Dykes.  Page 9 of Exhibit 19 is the website about GAL Scott D. McKenzie.  Pages 10 and 11 of Exhibit 19 are websites about her former husband, Hal Richardson.  Page 12 of Exhibit 19 is another website about Jill Dykes.  Page 13 of Exhibit 19 is another website about Rene Netherton.  Pages 14-18 of Exhibit 19 is a website called Glenn’s Cult that also attacks Rene Netherton.  Pages 19-21 of Exhibit 19 is a website called The Truth About The Family Court.  Pages 22-23 of Exhibit 19 is a website called Kansas Court Whores, one of the sites that published an article calling me a sexual predator.  Pages 24-29 of Exhibit 19 is a website called Kansas Fatherhood Initiatives, one of the sites that published an article calling me a sexual predator.
  8. I have been unable to locate Exhibit 7.  A recent posting online by DOMBROWSKI said she would have an army to meet me when I came to Topeka.
  9. Exhibit 47 hereto includes several publications by DOMBROWSKI that make it clear that she is the American Mothers Political Party and claims full responsibility for everything that appears on its web pages.  She states that she created the American Mothers Political Party.  Thousands of people involved with family court issues nationwide know that DOMBROWSKI is the American Mothers Political Party.
  10. Exhibit 48 hereto contains two published articles by DOMBROWSKI on the news service, Newsvine.  One shows the video that I filmed of her and says I am a con man.  The other says I am a sexual predator.  These articles clearly show they were published by her.
  11. I ask the Court to realize that it is not possible for the hundreds and hundreds of defamatory articles posted in the name of DOMBROWSKI could have been done by anyone other than her.  She also claims responsibility for everything published by the American Mothers Political Party, and there is a massive amount of stalking and defamation done on their Facebook page, which is provided as part of Exhibit 1 – flash drive.
  12. Exhibit 49 hereto is a publication that DOMBROWSKI made that talks about the Safe At Home program and shows her card with the assigned address.  This is the address published online for the American Mothers Political Party.  This is defamatory and stalking.  For someone else to have written this article, they would have to have access to her state-issued ID card as well as information about this program.  DOMBROWSKI wrote this, just as she has written and claimed all of the stuff that has been published.
  13. Exhibit 50 hereto is the home page of a website titled “I-am-a-pedophile-william-windsor.”  It shows 102 articles have been published about me on this site in 2013.  It lists many other sites about me, including sites about me being a pedophile, having a tiny penis, being a terrorist, being a sexual deviant, not having balls, liking to suck cock, and other such outrageous terms.
  14. Exhibit 51 hereto is DOMBROWSKI’S most recent post on her website.  In this post, she admits that she and the American Mothers Political Party are on in the same.  She speaks of an article that recently denounced her written by internationally-renowned spousal abuse advocate, Lundy Bancroft.  This article is included in a prior exhibit.  Additional pages from her website are included with comments about me.
  15. I have shown that I am in fear for my safety.  I have demonstrated that my family is terrorized in fear for their safety.  I have shown a perhaps unprecedented volume of stalking, in terms of both the number of people involved and the volume of written material.  I have shown that Google shows over 15,000 web pages that publish that I am a sexual deviant.  I am not a sexual deviant.  I am not any of these things that these sick people publish.  I have shown a continual publication of hundreds of articles over a long period of time that is continuing as I type this.  I have proven as well as anyone could that DOMBROWSKI published an extensive amount of defamatory and stalking material.  To say that she didn’t publish this material would be to say that someone has stolen her information, ID card, identity, business, Facebook pages, LinkedIn pages, MySpace pages, YouTube pages, WordPress pages, numerous websites, Business Week login, Newsvine login, and has done all of this without the very active DOMBROWSKI ever saying someone was doing this.
  16. I have filed criminal charges with the Topeka Police Department.  I ask this Court to contact the District Attorney and ask him to investigate.  If this doesn’t meet the criminal defamation statute, I don’t believe anything ever will.

FURTHER SAITH AFFIANT NOT.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed this 27th day of July 2013.

__________________________________

William M. Windsor

13D1747-Affidavit-of-Windsor-2013-07-27

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-05

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-06-A

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-08

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-09

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-10-A

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-19-2

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-19-3

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-47

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-48

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-49

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-50

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-51

Bill Windsor files a Supplement to his Amended Verified Petition for Ex Parte Protective Order against Claudine Dombrowski

California-Los-Angeles-Group-lobby-william-2012-09-28-cropped-tight-edited-640w

Bill Windsor files a Supplement to his Amended Verified Petition for Ex Parte Protective Order against Claudine Dombrowski.

AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION

FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER – SUPPLEMENT

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Plaintiff”) and files this AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER – SUPPLEMENT.  PLAINTIFF shows the Court as follows:

  1. 1.             On July 26, 2013 at 3:45 pm, the PLAINTIFF filed the AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER.
  2. The PLAINTIFF inadvertently failed to include a few of the exhibits.
  3. This SUPPLEMENT adds those exhibits as well as a sworn affidavit, and some new exhibits.  The AFFIDAVIT is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF prays that this Court enter an order granting the petition for an ex parte protective order.

Submitted this 27th day of July, 2013,

_________________________

William M. Windsor

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-Supplement-2013-07-27

Bill Windsor files an Amended Petition in effort to obtain a Stalking Protective Order against Claudine Dombrowski and her associates

2013-07-17-Kansas-Topeka-Shawnee-County-Courthouse (1)-640w

Bill Windsor files an Amended Petition in effort to obtain a Stalking Protective Order against Claudine Dombrowski and her associates.  This was filed in CASE NO. 13D1747 in the District Court of Shawnee County Kansas.  Extensive exhibits are provided at the end of the Petition.

AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION

FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER

Comes Now, William M. Windsor (“Plaintiff”) and files this AMENDED VERIFIED PETITION FOR EX PARTE PROTECTIVE ORDER.  PLAINTIFF shows the Court as follows:

  1. DEFENDANT CLAUDINE DOMBROWSKI (“DOMBROWSKI”) is a serial liar who, among other things, is publishing that the PLAINTIFF is a sexual deviant and a terrorist.
  2. DOMBROWSKI failed to appear for the hearing on July 25, 2013 at 1:30 pm.
  3. The Court commented on the need to amplify on the PLAINTIFF’S fear for his safety and the safety of his family.  The Court also indicated the need to establish that DOMBROWSKI published the information that has caused fear.
  4. The PLAINTIFF references and incorporates the original petition as if attached hereto.
  5. The PLAINTIFF verifies this Petition before a notary under penalty of perjury stating that all facts contained herein are true and correct based upon his personal knowledge, so this Amended Verified Petition also serves as sworn testimony of the PLAINTIFF.  This provides the information requested.
  6. The PLAINTIFF badly needs this Court to issue a protective order.

THE PURPOSE OF THE PROTECTION FROM STALKING ACT

  1. The clear purpose of the Protection from Stalking ACT (“PSA”) is to PROTECT people from others.  The act is to be “liberally construed.”
  2. This means the Court must make a broad interpretation of the statute and the issues presented applicable to the statute.
  3. Liberally construing a 2002 act in 2013 means the PSA must properly consider cyber stalking.  Online research indicates that a 1999 U.S. Department of Justice report may have the first explanation of this new form of stalking.  Cyber stalking is clearly recognized as a significant form of stalking.  This Court should “liberally construe” the need for protection to properly consider the impact of cyber-stalking and how it does apply to this statute.
  4. The internet has enabled online groups of often-anonymous people to self-organize to target individuals with online defamation, threats of violence and technology-based attacks. These include publishing lies and doctored photographs, threats of rape and other violence, posting sensitive personal information about victims, e-mailing damaging statements about victims to their employers, and manipulating search engines to make damaging material about the victim more prominent.  Experts attribute the destructive nature of anonymous online mobs to group dynamics, saying that groups with homogeneous views tend to become more extreme as members reinforce each other’s beliefs, they fail to see themselves as individuals, so they lose a sense of personal responsibility for their destructive acts, they dehumanize their victims, which makes them more willing to behave destructively, and they become more aggressive when they believe they are supported by authority figures.  This is being done to the PLAINTIFF, and more.
  5. There is absolutely no question that these people have followed the PLAINTIFF online and contacted the PLAINTIFF online for the purpose of harassing and intimidating the PLAINTIFF.  They have attempted to terrify, threaten, harass, annoy, and offend the PLAINTIFF with lewd and profane language, lewd and lascivious acts, threats to inflict physical harm, and more.
  6. Virtually all of the stalking and harassment has been cyberstalking, the use of the Internet and email to stalk and harass the PLAINTIFF and those acquainted with the PLAINTIFF.
  7. The stalking includes the making of false accusations and false statements.  These include that the PLAINTIFF is a pedophile, a pedophile lover, anti-gay, bigoted, a criminal operating a scam, and much more.
  8. The stalking includes monitoring, as the stalkers claim to be tracking the PLAINTIFF’s Internet activity.  Some stalkers participate in the PLAINTIFF’s online radio talk shows to monitor and/or to disrupt the calls and the online chat.  The monitoring includes repeated online posts of libelous, threatening, harassing statements.
  9. The stalking includes threats.
  10. Any reasonable person in possession of this information would regard it as sufficient to cause another reasonable person distress.
  11. The libel and slander is truly unbelievable.  These stalkers invent one false claim after another.  People who the PLAINTIFF doesn’t know make statements in writing that have no truth whatsoever and can be easily proven to be false.  It’s like they feel they can say anything and get away with it.
  12. The stalkers have repeatedly violated the PLAINTIFF’s privacy rights and copyright by using photos and videos of me that they have no legal right to use.  Photographs of the PLAINTIFF have been doctored.  Absolutely sickening videos have been produced about the PLAINTIFF.
  13. The PLAINTIFF has 15 gigabytes of online posts, emails, videos, and more.
  14. The PLAINTIFF believes Claudine Dombrowski uses multiple aliases and screen names in her stalking of the PLAINTIFF.
  15. Claudine Dombrowski has knowingly attempted to place the PLAINTIFF in fear of physical harm; she has associated with others who have threatened or implied the desire to commit physical harm to the PLAINTIFF, including people who have sent messages to the PLAINTIFF with deadly weapons – gun, knife, and hammer; has harassed the PLAINTIFF; has engaged in a purposeful course of conduct involving more than one incident that alarms or causes distress to the PLAINTIFF and serves no legitimate purpose; that she has followed the PLAINTIFF in public places online; has stalked the PLAINTIFF; has purposely and repeatedly engaged in an unwanted course of conduct that causes alarm to the PLAINTIFF when it is reasonable in the PLAINTIFF’S situation to have been alarmed by the conduct; has caused the PLAINTIFF to fear of danger of physical harm; has committed a pattern of conduct composed of repeated acts over a period of time that serves no legitimate purpose; has sent the PLAINTIFF unwanted communication; has made unwanted contact; and has been a major cause of the PLAINTIFF’S loss of his marriage, his children, and his grandchildren.

THE PLAINTIFF IS A VICTIM OF STALKING

  1. The PLAINTIFF is clearly a victim of stalking.  Exhibit 1 hereto is a true and correct copy of a flash drive made by the PLAINTIFF containing approximately 7 gigabytes of evidence of stalking, defamation, harassment, threats, and more that the PLAINTIFF has obtained and kept on a hard drive.
  2. K.S.A. 60-31 provides: “This act shall be liberally construed to protect victims of stalking and to facilitate access to judicial protection for stalking victims….”  And stalking is defined:  “…an intentional harassment of another person that places the other person in reasonable fear for that person’s safety.”  Harassment is defined as “a knowing and intentional course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments or terrorizes the person, and that serves no legitimate purpose.”  If we put those two definitions together, stalking is a knowing and intentional course of conduct directed at a specific person that seriously alarms, annoys, torments or terrorizes the person, that serves no legitimate purpose, and places the other person in reasonable fear for that person’s safety.
  3. The PLAINTIFF is a stalking victim.
  4. The only evidence before this Court is that the PLAINTIFF is a stalking victim.
  5. K.S.A. 60-31 doesn’t say that the law requires that a Court decide if a person is in reasonable fear for his safety; the law requires that the person says he is in reasonable fear for his safety and/or his family’s safety.
  6. The PLAINTIFF said in the original petition: “I fear for my safety.  My family is terrorized.”  The Plaintiff repeats this statement of fact.  The PLAINTIFF is in reasonable fear for his safety.
  7. Since there is no evidence to the contrary and the only person in the world who can say whether or not he is in fear for his safety is the PLAINTIFF, this Court may not accept anything else as fact in making a prima facie decision.
  8. The threat from cyber-stalking is actually much greater than the threat when a man threatens a woman with physical harm.  In the cyber-stalking that the PLAINTIFF must endure every second of every day, the stalking is from many people — a gang of cyber-stalkers.  The PLAINTIFF believes as many as 1,000 people could be involved, and he has identified the names of over 500 who he knows or strongly believes to be involved in cyber-stalking him in some manner.  Exhibit 2 hereto is a list of 532 of these people.  As the president of the American Mothers Political Party, an organization with over 1,300 followers, DOMBROWSKI has mobilized and leads a perhaps unprecedented cyber-stalking campaign against the PLAINTIFF.
  9. Any one of these people could do physical harm to the PLAINTIFF or his family, and all who participate make it just that much more likely that the PLAINTIFF or his family will be harmed.  Because they publish outlandish lies and defamation about the PLAINTIFF, a person who hates pedophiles could attack the PLAINTIFF because publications on the Internet and websites set up such as “Bill-Windsor-is-a-pedophile” may cause pedophile haters to believe the PLAINTIFF is a pedophile.  It is well-known that in prison, the inmates generally hate pedophiles and will hurt them.
  10. The PLAINTIFF has been falsely and maliciously branded in all types of horrendous ways in publications that have reached millions all over the world: pedophile, pedophile lover, bigot, anti-gay, sexual deviant, terrorist, person who has sex with animals, con man, criminal, and much more.
  11. K.S.A. 60-31 requires a “course of conduct.”  “Course of conduct” means conduct consisting of two or more separate acts over a period of time, however short, evidencing a continuity of purpose which would cause a reasonable person to suffer substantial emotional distress.
  12. The PLAINTIFF has provided extensive documentation of the course of conduct as Exhibits hereto.  The cyber-stalking has been regular for at least 18 months.  There are currently dozens of websites and hundreds of published articles set up to cyber-stalk and threaten the PLAINTIFF.  The cyber-stalkers have taken special efforts to ensure that these websites and defamatory publications rank high in Internet searches.  Exhibit 3 hereto includes pages from some of these websites with published statements that the PLAINTIFF is a terrorist, pedophile, stalker, abuser, sexual predator, sexual pervert, has no balls, only happy when sucking hard cock, cock sucker, sexual deviant, has a tiny penis, and more.
  13. The PLAINTIFF was not a gun owner before this happened to him, but now he owns a gun.  Because he does not yet have a carry permit, and because he travels all over the country, carrying a gun for protection is legally problematic.  So, the PLAINTIFF bought pepper spray, a little buzzer-like stun gun, a portable alarm, a dashcam, and a Louisville Slugger baseball bat.  The pepper spray, stun gun, and portable alarm go everywhere the PLAINTIFF goes except courthouses, police stations, and other places where these items are prohibited.  The baseball bat and dashcam remain in the PLAINTIFF’S Jeep at all times.  The PLAINTIFF keeps his doors locked at all times, consciously tries to always park under a light, sits with his back to the wall so he can see an entire room, walks briskly, and considers that anyone approaching could be a danger.  The PLAINTIFF can no longer publish where he will be working because cyber-stalkers have threatened to come and hurt him.  The PLAINTIFF is attempting to keep the location of his new residence a secret so stalkers will not come and harm him and terrorize him as some have published they will do.  The PLAINTIFF heaves a sigh of relief every time he turns on his car and it doesn’t blow up.  On two occasions, the Plaintiff has come to his car in the morning in a hotel parking lot to find the motor running, the air conditioning on high, and the car locked with the only key in the PLAINTIFF’S pocket.
  14. The PLAINTIFF does these things because he fears for his safety.
  15. The PLAINTIFF’S family is terrorized by the cyber-stalking and threats.  The PLAINTIFF and his wife rarely ever had a relationship problem in 42 years together, but the PLAINTIFF’S wife divorced him solely because she is absolutely terrorized.  The PLAINTIFF’S adult children are very afraid.  The PLAINTIFF’S daughter will not allow the PLAINTIFF to have any communication with his two precious granddaughters who he loves more than words could ever express.  When the PLAINTIFF’S wife announced she was divorcing him, she specifically stated that she was doing it in hopes that she could distance herself from the cyber-stalkers and threats.

THE SPECIFIC THREATS

  1. The PLAINTIFF has received many threats, some explicit and some veiled.
  2. DOMBROWSKI recently published that she was going to use a .45 on the PLAINTIFF and put him out of his misery.  [Exhibit 4 hereto.] She also published the name and address of where the PLAINTIFF could be found in Topeka – information that the PLAINTIFF did not provide to anyone. [Exhibit 5 hereto.]
  3. DOMBROWSKI has declared war on the PLAINTIFF. [Exhibit 6 hereto.]
  4. DOMBROWSKI recently published that she was going to have an Army against the PLAINTIFF if he ever came to Topeka. [Exhibit 7 hereto.]
  5. DOMBROWSKI’S Facebook page has promoted for her over 1,300 followers to watch the movie, “Kill Bill.” [Exhibit 8 hereto.]
  6. DOMBROWSKI’S #2 person in the so-called American Mothers Political Party, Lorraine Tipton, has published in an article defaming the PLAINTIFF that one of her favorite scenes from a movie is one where a man named Bill gets killed. [Exhibit 9 hereto.]
  7. One of DOMBROWSKI’S associates, Curtis Butler, has recorded a YouTube video in which he threatens to track the PLAINTIFF down wherever he moves and do bodily harm to him.  In the video, Butler admits that he is an alcoholic, and he is drinking Everclear straight from the bottle.  Those who know what to look for indicate that he shows signs of being on meth.  Curtis Butler is extremely frightening.  No one in their right mind would record a video saying they were going to kill someone, but he did.  Curtis Butler is absolutely someone who could do physical harm to the PLAINTIFF. [This Video is in a folder titled Curtis Butler on Exhibit 1 hereto.]
  8. Another of DOMBROWSKI’S associates, Sean Boushie, has repeatedly threatened to hurt and kill the PLAINTIFF.  He has used Charles Manson as his photo, a huge knife, and a Glock gun.  He has threatened to shoot the PLAINTIFF.  He says that when the PLAINTIFF comes to Missoula Montana, a bulletproof vest won’t do any good, implying he will go for a headshot. [Exhibit 10 hereto contains various threats from Sean Boushie.]
  9. Another of DOMBROWSKI’S associates, Brannon Bridge, has published several videos in which he indicates he plans to beat the PLAINTIFF with a hammer.  In another video, he is seen sticking pins into a Bill Windsor doll.  [Exhibit 1 hereto includes these videos in a folder titled Brannon Bridge.]
  10. Another of DOMBROWSKI’S associates, Allie Overstreet, swore in a petition for a protective order in Missouri that the PLAINTIFF had repeatedly published that he had bought a gun and planned to kill a large group of people, including her.  She filed a police report at the same time making this charge and dozens of absolutely false claims.  The purpose of this was to try to get the PLAINTIFF sent to prison.  This threat was very real as the PLAINTIFF had to travel from his home in Georgia to Lafayette County Missouri to stand trial for being a would-be serial killer and/or mass murderer. [Exhibit 11 hereto is the sworn affidavit for a protective order and the report filed with the Higginsville Police Department.]
  11. Another woman, Shannon E. Miller, has apparently filed a similar complaint with the Biloxi Mississippi Police Department. [Exhibit 1 hereto contains a folder titled Shannon Miller, and this includes stalking and harassment from this woman, a big supporter of the American Mothers Political Party.]
  12. Members of DOMBROWSKI’S group, the so-called American Mothers Political Party, have published that they have made police complaints and FBI complaints all over the country; they have published that they are working with the IRS against the PLAINTIFF; and they launched a letter-writing campaign to try to get the Sundance Film Festival to block the premiere of the PLAINTIFF’S movie at the festival.  The very real threat that some law enforcement agency will act against the PLAINTIFF is very real, even though the PLAINTIFF has not committed any crimes, has never been arrested or charged with a crime, and doesn’t even have a traffic ticket or parking ticket in over 12 years.  [Exhibit 1 hereto contains a folder titled AMPP, and this includes stalking and harassment from the American Mothers Political Party.]
  13. Another group of DOMBROWSKI’S associates publish one defamatory article after another at http://joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com.  This website recently published an article with a reward if someone did bodily harm to the PLAINTIFF while he was in Texas, and double the reward if the PLAINTIFF was sent to the morgue. [Exhibit 12 hereto is this reward notice.]  [Exhibit 1 hereto contains a folder titled Joeyisalittlekid that includes stalking and harassment from this group.]
  14. Lord only knows how many threats have been published online.  The PLAINTIFF anticipates that it would take at least one full-time person just to keep up with what is published and the comments that people make.  The PLAINTIFF fears that there are far more threats that he doesn’t know about.

THE PRIVACY RIGHTS OF THE PLAINTIFF HAVE BEEN VIOLATED

  1. The privacy rights of the PLAINTIFF have been violated.
  2. DOMBROWSKI and her associates have given publicity to matters concerning the PLAINTIFF.
  3. DOMBROWSKI and her associates have invaded the PLAINTIFF’s privacy.  The PLAINTIFF’s name has been misappropriated as has the name of his deceased parents.  The PLAINTIFF’s photos and intellectual property have been misappropriated many times.  [Exhibit 13 hereto is a Facebook site set up in the name of the PLAINTIFF.]  [Exhibit 14 hereto is a Facebook site set up in the name of the PLAINTIFF’S deceased father.  Photos taken from his tribute website include him in his death bed and is coffin at the funeral home.  Another page shows what is allegedly his skeleton, and another page has a photo of him on his death bed allegedly having phone sex with his deceased wife, the PLAINTIFF’S mother.]  [Exhibit 15 hereto is a Facebook site set up in the name of the PLAINTIFF’S deceased mother.  It shows what is allegedly her skeleton bones wearing a wig.]
  4. DOMBROWSKI and her associates have publicly disclosed private facts about the PLAINTIFF, and totally false personal information has been publicly disclosed.  Facts disclosed include alleged sex life, alleged criminal activity, alleged failure to pay taxes, alleged pedophilia, and much more.
  5. There is an absolutely false article on Business Week’s website posted by DOMBROWSKI that claims the PLAINTIFF is a sexual deviant and a terrorist.  [Exhibit 16 hereto is this article.]  [Exhibit 17 hereto is a printout of hundreds of web pages out of over 10,000 that are showing “Bill Windsor – Sexual Deviant.]  [Exhibit 18 hereto are the definitions of deviant, sexual deviant, and terrorist – each of which are highly defamatory, false, and criminal if true.]  [Exhibit 19 hereto are screenshots of some of DOMBROWSKI’S websites defaming and stalking the PLAINTIFF.]
  6. The PLAINTIFF’s personal photos, photos of family members, as well as photos and alleged photos of his family have been published to damage the PLAINTIFF and in violation of his privacy and intellectual property rights. The matters publicized would be offensive to a reasonable person.  The disclosures have humiliated the PLAINTIFF.

DOMBROWSKI HAS COMMITTED MANY VIOLATIONS

 OF KANSAS CRIMINAL STATUTES

  1. DOMBROWSKI has committed many counts of violations of Kansas’ statute on Criminal Defamation.
    1. 21-4004 – Criminal Defamation: (a) Criminal defamation is communicating to a person orally, in writing, or by any other means, information, knowing the information to be false and with actual malice, tending to expose another living person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule; tending to deprive such person of the benefits of public confidence and social acceptance; or tending to degrade and vilify the memory of one who is dead and to scandalize or provoke surviving relatives and friends.
    2. Exhibit 1 hereto contains a folder titled Claudine Dombrowski that includes extensive evidence of defamation. [Exhibit 20 hereto contains a few of the various published statements by DOMBROWSKI defaming, harassing, and/or stalking the PLAINTIFF.]
    3. DOMBROWSKI has committed many counts of violations of Kansas’ criminal statute on Stalking.
      1. 21-3438. Stalking: (a) Stalking is:  (1)   Intentionally or recklessly engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person which would cause a reasonable person in the circumstances of the targeted person to fear for such person’s safety, or the safety of a member of such person’s immediate family and the targeted person is actually placed in such fear;  (2)   intentionally engaging in a course of conduct targeted at a specific person which the individual knows will place the targeted person in fear for such person’s safety or the safety of a member of such person’s immediate family; or  (1)   “Course of conduct” means two or more acts over a period of time, however short, which evidence a continuity of purpose. A course of conduct shall not include constitutionally protected activity nor conduct that was necessary to accomplish a legitimate purpose independent of making contact with the targeted person. A course of conduct shall include, but not be limited to, any of the following acts or a combination thereof:  (A)   Threatening the safety of the targeted person or a member of such person’s immediate family.  (B)   Following, approaching or confronting the targeted person or a member of such person’s immediate family.  (G)   Any act of communication.  (2)   “Communication” means to impart a message by any method of transmission, including, but not limited to: Telephoning, personally delivering, sending or having delivered, any information or material by written or printed note or letter, package, mail, courier service or electronic transmission, including electronic transmissions generated or communicated via a computer.  (3)   “Computer” means a programmable, electronic device capable of accepting and processing data.   (5)   “Immediate family” means father, mother, stepparent, child, stepchild, sibling, spouse or grandparent of the targeted person; any person residing in the household of the targeted person; or any person involved in an intimate relationship with the targeted person.
      2. The PLAINTIFF is far from the only person who is stalked by DOMBROWSKI.  Exhibit 21 hereto is the Affidavit of Janice Levinson prepared for this Court that details her stalking by DOMBROWSKI.  [Exhibit 22 hereto includes screenshots of other websites that DOMBROWSKI operates to stalk and defame others, including Topeka attorneys and doctors.]
      3. The criminal definition of “stalking” in Kansas clearly incorporates the PLAINTIFF’S family, and the PLAINTIFF’S family members have made their fear absolutely clear to the PLAINTIFF.
      4. DOMBROWSKI has committed many counts of violations of Kansas’ statute on Criminal Threats.
        1. 21-3419 – Criminal threat:  (a) A criminal threat is any threat to:   (1)   Commit violence communicated with intent to terrorize another, or to cause the evacuation, lock down or disruption in regular, ongoing activities of any building, place of assembly or facility of transportation, or in reckless disregard of the risk of causing such terror or evacuation, lock down or disruption in regular, ongoing activities; [emphasis added]
        2. Previously referenced threats to shoot the PLAINTIFF with a .45, Kill Bill, wage war on the PLAINTIFF, and bring an army against the PLAINTIFF may all be considered criminal threats.

THE ACTIVITY THAT MAY BREED A KILLER

  1. The threats to the PLAINTIFF are not just from specific threats to do harm or veiled death threats, they are also from all the defamatory, malicious, complete fabrications of criminal activity statements published all over the Internet. [Exhibits 1, 12, 17, 19, 20 hereto contain just a few of the thousands of web pages that defame the PLAINTIFF.]
  2. Thus far, the PLAINTIFF has identified over 32 websites set up specifically to defame him and incite people who read the sites, and many other websites operated by DOMBROWSKI and her associates that are used for the same purposes.  These sites include the following:
    1. http://i-am-a-pedophile-william-windsor.blogspot.com
    2. http://william–windsor.blogspot.com/
    3. http://i-am-a-pedophile-william-windsor.blogspot.com/
    4. http://tiny-penis-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/
    5. http://terrorist-billwindsor-lawlessamerica.blogspot.com/
    6. http://stalker-williamwindsor.blogspot.com/
    7. http://lawlessamerica-domesticterrorist.blogspot.com/
    8. http://lawlessamerica-cult.blogspot.com/
    9. http://i-suck-dick-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/
    10. http://i-have-no-balls-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/
    11. http://sexual-pervert-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/
    12. http://pedophile-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/
    13. http://bill–windsor.blogspot.com/
    14. http://bill-windsor.blogspot.com/
    15. http://bill-windsor-sexual-deviant.blogspot.com/
    16. http://www.facebook.com/uglyamericanz
    17. http://www.facebook.com/babs.windsor.35
    18. http://www.facebook.com/barbara.windsor.134
    19. http://www.facebook.com/billwindsor.files
    20. http://www.facebook.com/billwindsore
    21. http://www.facebook.com/bill.windsor.33
    22. http://www.facebook.com/ceaseanddesistbillwindsor
    23. http://www.facebook.com/pages.exposing-bill-windsor
    24. http://www.facebook.com/pages/lawless-america-is-a-fraud
    25. http://www.facebook.com/pages-lawless-america-the-movie-scam
    26. http://www.facebook.com/lawlessisascam
    27. http://williamwindsor-sexualpredator.blogspot.com/
    28. http://www.facebook.com/lawlessnomore
    29. http://www.facebook.com/mary.windsor.102
    30. http://www.facebook.com/walter.windsor.96
    31. http://www.facebook.com/billwindsorisafraudandliesouttheass
    32. http://amothersintelligencesecretservice.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-name-is-bill-windsor-i-am-sexual.html
    33. http://thetruthaboutthefamilycourt.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-name-is-bill-windsor-i-am-sexual.html
    34. http://abuserrightsfatherrights.blogspot.com
    35. http://amothersintelligencesecretservice.blogspot.com/
    36. http://www.kscourtwhores.blogspot.com/
    37. http://thetruthaboutthefamilycourt.blogspot.com
    38. http://claudinedombrowski.blogspot.com
    39. http://glennscult.blogspot.com
    40. http://bx.businessweek.com/open-government/janice-levinson-using-the-blood-of-battered-mothers-and-children-for-her-personal-gain/7420065467279087640-54223d6685f4e599a8d5d17d4bb694b9/
    41. http://amothersintelligencesecretservice.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-name-is-bill-windsor-i-am-sexual.html
    42. http://www.kscourtwhores.blogspot.com/2013/06/bill-windsor-sexual-deviant-homeland.html
    43. http://joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com/2013/05/sexual-deviant-bill-windsor.html
    44. http://www.kscourtwhores.blogspot.com/2013/07/announcement-for-all-protective-mothers.html
    45. http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/claudine-dombrowski/cdombrowski891/
    46. Bill Windsor – Sexual Deviant, Homeland Terrorist and His Cult Group
    47. Janice Levinson: Using the Blood of Battered Mothers and Children for
    48. Kansas Secretary of State Is not happy with Lawless America
    49. Janice Levinson: When You Play With Wolves
    50. Bill Windsor – Endangering Domestic Violence Victims and Survivors
    51. William M Windsor: An American Terrorist
    52. Bill Windsor – Endangering Domestic Violence Victims and Survivors
    53. http://bx.businessweek.com/open-government/view?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjoeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com%2F2013%2F05%2Fsexual-deviant-bill-windsor.html
    54. http://bx.businessweek.com/open-government/bill-windsor—sexual-deviant-homeland-terrorist-and-his-cult-group-lawless-america/9132679831200724084-9af7df0d7aabf80a43169c3e40317490/
    55. Unforgiven Little Bill Death Scenehttps://www.facebook.com/lorraine.tipton.14
    56. http://batteredmotherscustody.blogspot.com/2013_03_01_archive.html

Pages from some of these websites are attached as Exhibit 19 the AFFIDAVIT.  All may be viewed online.

  1. The PLAINTIFF fears that an unbalanced person reading some of this information may well provide the biggest threat.  The PLAINTIFF fears injury or death from someone that he doesn’t even know who has been incited by the unbelievable claims, comparisons to Hitler, and assertion after assertion that the PLAINTIFF sexually abuses children.

PROOF THAT DOMBROWSKI HAS

PERSONALLY STALKED THE PLAINTIFF

  1. The PLAINTIFF has met, filmed, and photographed DOMBROWSKI.
  2. The PLAINTIFF has a contract with DOMBROWSKI in which she provided her name, address, phone, email, and website information.  When the PLAINTIFF filmed DOMBROWSKI in 2012, she told the PLAINTIFF that she was the president and founder of the American Mothers Political Party.  The PLAINTIFF has received emails and messages from DOMBROWSKI.
  3. The publications by DOMBROWSKI include her photograph and are tied to accounts in her name.  The photographs match photographs that the PLAINTIFF has of DOMBROWSKI.
  4. Publications by DOMBROWSKI and some of her associates appear on the so-called American Mothers Political Party website. [Exhibit 23 hereto.]
  5. Music that plays on the http://americanmotherspoliticalparty.org/ website is identical to that on many of the other websites operated by DOMBROWSKI.
  6. The American Mothers Political Party has a BlogTalk Radio program. These programs have the voice of Claudine Dombrowski that is the same as her voice in the video filmed by the PLAINTIFF.  One example is: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/americanmotherspoliticalparty/2011/08/25/american-mothers-political-party  [Exhibit 24 hereto.]
  7. The BlogTalk radio website lists the website for the American Mothers Political Party, the Facebook page, and the Twitter account – all of which have been used to stalk the PLAINTIFF. [Exhibit 25 hereto.]
  8. The American Mothers Political Party website shows DOMBROWSKI’S official Safe at Home address provided by the Kansas Secretary of State.  This is the same address that the PLAINTIFF provided to this Court for service on DOMBROWSKI. [Exhibit 26 hereto.]
  9. The American Mothers Political Party website has a Contact Page that has the ability to show the email address.  That email address goes to DOMBROWSKI. [Exhibit 27 hereto.]
  10. The American Mothers Political Party website has published the article declaring the PLAINTIFF to be a sexual deviant and a terrorist, the same article that DOMBROWSKI published on the Business Week website and many other sites. http://americanmotherspoliticalparty.blogspot.com/2013/06/bill-windsor-sexual-deviant-homeland.html  [Exhibit 28 hereto.]
  11. The blogs promoted on the American Mothers Political Party include many where the PLAINTIFF has been defamed and stalked.  These include DOMBROWKSI’S personal blog where defamation and stalking has been done against the PLAINTIFF:  A Mothers Rage,A Movement Against Domestic Violence, A Target No More, Abusers Getting Custody, Alexis A. Moore, Alpha Inventions, American Children Underground (Jennifer Collins), American Mothers Political Party, AngelFury, AngelGroup.org, Angelzfury, Anne Caroline Drake, Anonymiss, Anonymoms (we are everywhere), Anonymuma, Anonymums, Australian Mothers Political Party, Australian Shared Parenting Law Debate, Autism Custody Battles, Baitul Salaam Network, Battered Moms Loose Custody To Abusers, Battered Mothers Custody Conference – BMCC, Battered Mothers – A Human Right’s Issue, Battered Mothers Child Custody Court Abuse, Battered Women Battered Children Custody Abuse, Best Interest Of The Child, Bring Jared Home, Bzzzz, Busted, California Protective Parents Association, Caroline Halonen-Rice – A Mothers Love, Chaos Theory, Children Against Court Appointed Child Abuse – CA3, Children’s Voices in Family Law, Claudine Dombrowski, Cold North Wind, Confessions of a Tormented Soul, County In Need of Change, Court Whores, Courageous Kids, Custody Prep for Moms, Dastardly Dads, Defend the Children, Domestic Violence Legal Empowerment and Appeals Project, Exposing the Untold Truths of Family Law (AU), Fatherlessness Family Court In America, Fathers Rights Naked Feminist Avengers, Feminist Manifesto, Fighting for Arizona’s Children, Find Jean Paul Diaz Lacombe, Fraud On The Court, Free Us Now, Gendered Violence Portal, GIVE ME MY MOM, Glenn’s Cult, Good Guys and Gals in Politics, Help Save Malie, How to Disapear, Human Rights For Abused Mothers And Children, Just Bee Aware, Justice for Children, Justice’s Posterous, Kansas Family Court Reform Coalition, Kansas Mothers For Custodial Justice, Kansans for Judicial Accountability, Kids In Distress (AU), Kids Need Mums (UK), Let’s Get Honest, Lovefraud, Mama Liberty, Media Misses, Mothers of Lost Children, Momentum Of Mothers (MOM), Mommy Go Bye-Bye, Mother – Fucking: The Saga of One Fucked Mother, Mothers Are Vanishing, Mothers Fight For Justice, Mothers For Equality, Mothers For Justice (UK), Mothers Intelligent Secret Service, Mothers Intelligence Secret Service -M.I.S.S., Mothers of Lost Children – Indiana, My Ex Is Worst Than Yours!!, Name That Pedophile, National Alliance for Family Court Justice, National Organization For Men Against Sexism on Custody & Abuse, New Jersey Women for Family Court Reform, No More Broken Wings, Non Custodial Moms of NY, Noncustodial Parent Community, NOMAS, No Way Out- But One, Obstreperous Expressions, Parental Alienation Racket, Parental Alienation Scam, Parenting News Network, Protective Parents For Children’s Rights, Randi James, Sacagawea’s Blog, Safety 4 Parents and Kids (AU), Save Aaliyah, Saving Damon, Sin Denied, Single Mum-AU, Stacey Momany, Stokes Family Blog, Stop Family Violence, Susan Murphy Milano’s Journal, Tailored Life Coaching, The Custody Scam, The Elders, The Institute for Relational Harm Reduction, The Leadership Council, The Liz Library, The Majority United, The National Domestic Violence Pro Bono Directory, The Shared Parenting Disaster, The Survivor Manual from Angela Shelton, The Truth About The Family Court, Times Up! ,UniFem, UN Mothers, Until You Say Uncle – by Julie Levine, VANISHED!, Violence Against Women News Central, Was It Really Worth It?, Women As Mothers, Women in Crime Ink, Womens Legal Resource, WomensLaw.org.
  12. The American Mothers Political Party Facebook page has viciously stalked and defamed the PLAINTIFF.  The page currently has an article posted by DOMBROWSKI showing her photograph, a photograph that the PLAINTIFF recognizes to be her. [Exhibit 29 hereto.]
  13. The American Mothers Political Party website has a membership application.  That application is hosted at DocStoc.  The DocStoc page with the application shows that it was posted by DOMBROWSKI.  [Exhibit 30 hereto.]  When you click on the link for DOMBROWSKI’S name, it takes you to her DocStoc account page which includes copies of numerous filings in her legal cases in Shawnee County Kansas. [Exhibit 31 hereto.]
  14. The American Mothers Political Party website has a link to the group’s Twitter page.  The Twitter account shows numerous posts that are stalking and defaming the PLAINTIFF. [Exhibit 32 hereto.]
  15. The American Mothers Political Party has a YouTube page.  That page contains a video that stalks and defames the PLAINTIFF. [Exhibit 33 hereto.]
  16. The American Mothers Political Party has produced many videos that stalk and defame the PLAINTIFF. [Exhibit 1 hereto contains a folder titled Videos.  The Court is asked to watch the video titled 1-Diarrhea of the Mouth – YouTube to get a flavour for what these videos contain.]
  17. DOMBROWSKI has a WordPress account.  That account shows her to be the author of the articles on that site.  [Exhibit 34 hereto.]  When you click on her name, it takes you to a page that shows the articles that she has written.  These include the widely-published article that the PLAINTIFF is a sexual deviant and a terrorist.  [Exhibit 35 hereto.]  One of these articles includes a photo of a woman carrying a gun, and in the published information, DOMBROWSKI says she will show the PLAINTIFF how to use a 45 calibre gun when he comes to Topeka. “It will be my pleasure to show you how to use a .45 up close and personal.  Put you out of your misery, mercy! [Exhibit 36 hereto.]
  18. DOMBROWSKI has a LinkedIn page.  It shows her to be the CEO of the American Mothers Political Party, and it includes the photograph shown on many of the defamatory and stalking publications against the PLAINTIFF by DOMBROWSKI. [Exhibit 37 hereto.]
  19. DOMBROWSKI has a website titled angelfury.org.  [Exhibit 38 hereto.]  When you click on her name at the bottom of the page, it opens an email addressed to her.  [Exhibit 39 hereto.]  The email address is the one that DOMBROWSKI gave to the PLAINTIFF as her email address.  This website includes links to many of the websites and webpages that stalk and defame the PLAINTIFF.
  20. http://abusiveadvocates.wordpress.com/ contains an article identifying DOMBROWSKI as the CEO and co-founder of the American Mothers Political Party. [Exhibit 40 hereto.]
  21. http://angelzfury.blogspot.com/2010/07/american-mothers-political-party-is-now.html is another website written by DOMBROWSKI.  It clearly shows her to be the creator of the American Mothers Political Party. [Exhibit 41 hereto.]
  22. The angelzfury.blogspot.com website has a hyperlink for DOMBROWSKI as the author.  [Exhibit 42 hereto.]  When you click it, it takes you to a Google Plus account for DOMBROWSKI.  [Exhibit 43 hereto.]  This has a number of stalking and defamatory publications, including one that shows she knew about the stalking hearing and was never going into another courtroom ever again.  This website also shows that DOMBROWSKI published the confidential name and address of the hotel where the PLAINTIFF was staying in Topeka.
  23. https://www.facebook.com/ClaudineDombrowski is one of many Facebook sites that DOMBROWSKI has.  This site contains many articles that defame and stalk the PLAINTIFF, including the one that says he is a sexual deviant and a terrorist. [Exhibit 44 hereto.]
  24. Imagine Publicity is a PR firm that has DOMBROWSKI as a client.  http://imaginepublicity.com/clients/claudine-dombrowski/ shows a photo of DOMBROWSKI that matches the photos the PLAINTIFF has of DOMBROWSKI, and it states that she is the leader of the American Mothers Political Party. [Exhibit 45 hereto.]
  25. The PLAINTIFF did a complete download of the American Mothers Political Party website that contains massive stalking and defamation of the PLAINTIFF. [Exhibit 1 hereto contains a folder titled AMPP.]
  26. If you do a Yahoo search for “Bill Windsor deviant,” many web pages are returned, most of which are websites written by DOMBROWSKI.  The same thing is true of searches for “Bill Windsor terrorist,” “Bill Windsor scam,” and “Bill Windsor fraud.”  Similar results are generated if you use William instead of Bill.
  27. A Google search for “Bill Windsor – sexual deviant” returns 15,500 pages.  One of the first results is a DOMBROWSKI site titled kansansforjudicialaccountability, and it shows her photo and the sexual deviant article.  The PLAINTIFF reviewed every web page returned by Google, and every one of them was the article published by DOMBROWSKI declaring the PLAINTIFF to be a sexual deviant and a terrorist. [Exhibit 17 hereto.]
  28. KSA 60-31 provides that this Court may enter temporary relief orders as it deems necessary to protect the victim from being stalked.  Temporary orders may be granted ex parte on presentation of a verified petition by the victim supporting a prima facie case of stalking.  The PLAINTIFF desperately needs protection from stalking.  The PLAINTIFF has provided this verified petition that provides the information that absolutely establishes a prima facie case of stalking.
  29. As the hearing on this matter was continued, the Court may make such temporary orders as it deems necessary.  The statute provides the following may be in an order of protection from stalking, and the PLAINTIFF respectfully requests this relief:
    1. Restraining the Defendant and anyone associated with her from following, harassing, telephoning, contacting, or otherwise communicating with the victim, including emailing, posting messages online, publishing or maintaining websites about the PLAINTIFF, or publishing articles or comments online about the PLAINTIFF.  Such order shall contain a statement that if such order is violated such violation may constitute stalking as defined in K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-5427, and amendments thereto, and violation of a protective order as defined in K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-5924, and amendments thereto.
    2. Restraining the defendant and anyone associated with her from abusing, molesting, or interfering with the privacy rights of the victim. This includes use of the PLAINTIFF’S photos, videos, and intellectual property, use of any information about the PLAINTIFF’S deceased parents or his family, publication of any private information about the PLAINTIFF.  Such order shall contain a statement that if such order is violated, such violation may constitute stalking as defined in K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-5427, and amendments thereto, assault as defined in subsection (a) of K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-5412, and amendments thereto, battery as defined in subsection (a) of K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-5413, and amendments thereto, and violation of a protective order as defined in K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-5924, and amendments thereto.
    3. Restraining the defendant and anyone associated with her from entering upon or in the PLAINTIFF’S residence or the immediate vicinity thereof or hotels that he uses while traveling, or upon or in the PLAINTIFF’S place of work, which includes filming locations in every state.  Such order shall contain a statement that if such order is violated, such violation shall constitute criminal trespass as defined in subsection (a)(1)(C) of K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-5808, and amendments thereto, and violation of a protective order as defined in K.S.A. 2012 Supp. 21-5924, and amendments thereto.
    4. Any other order deemed necessary by the court to carry out the provisions of this act, to include a provision that this order shall apply to all who have associated with the defendant in stalking the PLAINTIFF, including all members and followers of the American Mothers Political Party and joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com.

WHEREFORE, PLAINTIFF prays that this Court enter an order granting the petition for an ex parte protective order.

Submitted this 26th day of July, 2013,

William M. Windsor

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Verified-Petition-2013-07-26

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-01 is a 7 GB flash drive.

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-02

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-03

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-04

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-05

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-06

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-06-A

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-08

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-09

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-10

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-10-A

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-11

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-12

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-16

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-16-2

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-17

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-17-2

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-18

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-19-2

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-19-3

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-20

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-21

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-24

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-25

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-26

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-27

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-28

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-29

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-30

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-31

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-32

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-33

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-34

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-36

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-37

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-37-2

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-38

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-40

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-41

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-42

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-43

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-44

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-45

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-46-additionals

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-47

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-48

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-49

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-50

13D1747-Plaintiffs-Amended-Petition-2013-07-26-Exhibit-51

Claudine Dombrowski is a criminal cyberstalker

Kansas-Wichita-Lawless-America-Movie-2012-10-30 290-cropped-square-200w

Claudine Dombrowski is a criminal cyberstalker.

In my opinion, she must be mentally ill.  I cannot conceive how a person could act the way this woman acts, unless they were crazy.  Then again, maybe it is just because she is a mean, mean woman.

In my opinion, she is the lowest human life form.

She decided to defame me in ways that are incomprehensible.  Well, payback’s a bitch.  And my payback will always be the truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God.

I will do everything in my power to get this woman locked away in prison for as long as possible.

 

 

 

Claudine Dombrowski of the so-called American Mothers Political Party was a no-show for her trial on July 25, 2013 in Topeka Kansas

Kansas-Wichita-Lawless-America-Movie-2012-10-30 290-cropped-square-200w

Claudine Dombrowski of the so-called American Mothers Political Party was a no-show for her trial on July 25, 2013 in Topeka Kansas.

The judge has set September 12 as the new trial date, but the judge also allowed me to file an amended petition an affidavit for an ex parte restraining order against Claudine Dombrowski and her associates.  I filed that with the Court on July 26, 2013 after working almost around the clock to pull together additional examples of the cyberstalking and criminal defamation of Claudine Dom browski and her associates in crime.

I cannot wait to get this thing on a witness stand.

At about 2 am, I received an email from a wonderful activist friend with links to a whole bunch of web sites defaming me.  Take a look at these:

http://i-am-a-pedophile-william-windsor.blogspot.com

http://williamwindsor-sexualpredator.blogspot.com/

http://william–windsor.blogspot.com/

http://i-am-a-pedophile-william-windsor.blogspot.com/

http://tiny-penis-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/

http://terrorist-billwindsor-lawlessamerica.blogspot.com/

http://terrorist-billwindsor-lawlessamerica.blogspot.com/

http://stalker-williamwindsor.blogspot.com/

http://lawlessamerica-domesticterrorist.blogspot.com/

http://lawlessamerica-cult.blogspot.com/

http://i-suck-dick-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/

http://i-have-no-balls-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/

http://sexual-pervert-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/

http://pedophile-bill-windsor.blogspot.com/

http://bill–windsor.blogspot.com/

http://bill-windsor.blogspot.com/

http://bill-windsor-sexual-deviant.blogspot.com/

http://amothersintelligencesecretservice.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-name-is-bill-windsor-i-am-sexual.html

http://thetruthaboutthefamilycourt.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-name-is-bill-windsor-i-am-sexual.html

http://abuserrightsfatherrights.blogspot.com

http://amothersintelligencesecretservice.blogspot.com/

http://www.kscourtwhores.blogspot.com/

http://thetruthaboutthefamilycourt.blogspot.com

http://claudinedombrowski.blogspot.com

http://glennscult.blogspot.com

http://bx.businessweek.com/open-government/janice-levinson-using-the-blood-of-battered-mothers-and-children-for-her-personal-gain/7420065467279087640-54223d6685f4e599a8d5d17d4bb694b9/

http://amothersintelligencesecretservice.blogspot.com/2013/06/my-name-is-bill-windsor-i-am-sexual.html

http://www.kscourtwhores.blogspot.com/2013/06/bill-windsor-sexual-deviant-homeland.html

http://joeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com/2013/05/sexual-deviant-bill-windsor.html

http://www.kscourtwhores.blogspot.com/2013/07/announcement-for-all-protective-mothers.html

http://bx.businessweek.com/profile/claudine-dombrowski/cdombrowski891/

Bill Windsor – Sexual Deviant, Homeland Terrorist and His Cult Group

Janice Levinson: Using the Blood of Battered Mothers and Children for

Kansas Secretary of State Is not happy with Lawless America

Janice Levinson: When You Play With Wolves

Bill Windsor – Endangering Domestic Violence Victims and Survivors

William M Windsor: An American Terrorist

Bill Windsor – Endangering Domestic Violence Victims and Survivors

http://bx.businessweek.com/open-government/view?url=http%3A%2F%2Fjoeyisalittlekid.blogspot.com%2F2013%2F05%2Fsexual-deviant-bill-windsor.html

http://bx.businessweek.com/open-government/bill-windsor—sexual-deviant-homeland-terrorist-and-his-cult-group-lawless-america/9132679831200724084-9af7df0d7aabf80a43169c3e40317490/

Unforgiven Little Bill Death Scenehttps://www.facebook.com/lorraine.tipton.14

http://batteredmotherscustody.blogspot.com/2013_03_01_archive.html