Monthly Archives: July 2013

Claudine Dombrowski stalking hearing set for July 25, 2013 at Shawnee County Courthouse in Topeka Kansas

Kansas-Wichita-Lawless-America-Movie-2012-10-30 290-cropped-square-200w

Claudine Dombrowski stalking hearing set for July 25, 2013 at Shawnee County Courthouse in Topeka Kansas.

I just received an email advising me of this.  I am two full days away!@$#!@

I am delighted that a judge has set a hearing, but I hope I can get a continuance.  Perhaps he entered an ex parte protective order.  I haven’t received any paperwork.

So, we’ll see what the next hour brings.  I hate postponing the expose filming of Sean Boushie!

Bill Windsor leaves the Land of Claudine Dombrowski Cyberstalker headed for Box Elder South Dakota via the World’s Largest Ball of Twine

2013-07-19-Kansas-Cawker-City 024-640w

Bill Windsor leaves the Land of Claudine Dombrowski Cyberstalker headed for Box Elder South Dakota via the World’s Largest Ball of Twine.

Bill Windsor leaves the Land of Cyberstalker Claudine Dombrowski headed for Box Elder South Dakota via the World’s Largest Ball of Twine.

Claudine Dombrowski threatened me with bodily harm from “an army” if I came to Topeka and filmed her house.  Well, I came, and I filmed all of her alleged houses.  I even told her where I would be and when, but Claudine Dombrowski and her “army” were all no-shows.

I waited around until noon to see if the judge had ruled on my request for a temporary protective order against Claudine Dombrowski, but no word yet.  So I headed for Cawker City and perhaps my favorite sight to see in all of America: The World’s Largest Ball of Twine.

I enjoy quirky sights like this, and I have seen hundreds of the world’s largests, but the Ball of Twine is my favorite.  It’s my favorite because it ranks high on the quirky meter, but also because of the real life story behind it.

Frank Stoeber was just a farmer.  As most farmers do, he would pick up the twine left from hay bales and the like to keep his place tidy and orderly and so he could reuse the twine.  But he got such a big ball going that he decided he wouldn’t reuse it; he would just keep adding to it.  He started in 1953, and he reached 1,600,000 feet in 1961 when he turned the ball over to the town of Cawker City.  The town built a home for the Ball of Twine, and when it outgrew that, they built a bigger pavilion.  They staged an annual Twine-A-Thon, and they encouraged folks to bring sisal twine to be added to the Ball of Twine. By 2003, there was over 7,000,000 feet of twine.

I figure there was over 10,000 feet of twine as I saw it today.

Frank Stoeber had a dream, and it started with one-foot piece of twine.  He stayed focused on his mission to roll the World’s Largest Ball of Twine.  He stayed true to his objective and only allowed sisal twine.  And he inspired the townspeople of little Cawker City to carry the dream forward, and they have.

When I was there filming today, one car after another stopped to see the World’s Largest Ball of Twine.  It is a legitimate tourist attraction, and there seems to be nothing else in Cawker City.

I stopped at Ackerman Feed Store in Beloit Kansas and bought a “roll” of sisal twine so I could put it in the mailbox where folks can leave twine donations to be added at the next Twine-A-Thon.  They didn’t have any little rolls, so I had to spring for 2,500-feet at a cost of $15.  But it was well worth it to me; my twine will become part of an American institution, the World’s Largest Ball of Twine.

Frank Stoeber is a hero to me because he set out on a mission, remained focused, did everything he could, and then enlisted the help of others.  From one foot to over 10,000,000 feet.

Now, if we could just repeat what Frank Stoeber did with people.  If we can reach 10,000,000 people and get them inspired to save America and end government and judicial corruption, we will accomplish our mission.

Bill Windsor is still in Topeka Kansas working on the Claudine Dombrowski – American Mothers Political Party Case

2013-07-17-Kansas-Topeka-City-of-Topeka-gate-640w

Bill Windsor is still in Topeka Kansas working on the Claudine DombrowskiAmerican Mothers Political Party Case.

The judge has not yet ruled on my application for a Stalking Protective Order.  I have to leave today as I have to go “home” to Box Elder South Dakota to get a South Dakota driver’s license and to handle other such essentials.  And then on to Missoula Montana to film the pilot for the proposed Lawless America TV series.  I don’t have another day to stay here as it will make the Missoula schedule impossible to keep.  The Clerk says someone else can pick up my paperwork after the judge rules.

If you haven’t read about Claudine Dombrowski, please read the last six or seven articles I have posted as it will fill you in.

I will be stopping at one of my favorite places in America today as I head to South Dakota — Cawker City Kansas.

Cawker City is the home of the World’s Largest Ball of Twine.  I enjoyed the Grand Canyon, but I LOVED the World’s Largest Ball of Twine.  To me, it’s the epitome of quirky attractions.  But the truth is that it isn’t so quirky.  The farmer who started doing it did it for business reasons — pick up and save the twine.  But it then becomes a testament to a man on a mission, and then the town turned it into a monument and carries of the mission after he is long gone.  It’s a feel good story!

Weasel Curly (aka Matthew J. O’Connor) is playing slimy attorney games with me in Windsor v. Allie Overstreet.  Can you imagine that after the judge ordered her to appear for a deposition, Weasel Curly isn’t going tom do it?  And can you even believe that he is refusing to produce her electronic devices so we can get access to everything she his hiding and/or has deleted?

Lundy Bancroft, Internationally-renowned Women’s Rights Activist, denounces Claudine Dombrowski and the American Mothers Political Party just as Bill Windsor did several months ago

Lundy-Bancroft

Lundy Bancroft, Internationally-renowned Women’s Rights Activist, denounces Claudine Dombrowski and the American Mothers Political Party just as Bill Windsor did several months ago.  See http://lundybancroft.blogspot.com/

Here is Lundy Bancroft’s article:

Defending A Women’s Rights Activist Who Is Under Attack

NOTE: This post is about some of the internal dynamics of the national movement fighting for the custody rights of abused women (also referred to as “protective mothers,” because they are in the position of needing to protect their children from the other parent, but family courts are not permitting them to do so). If this issue doesn’t interest or affect you, or if you get triggered by news about infighting, I encourage you to skip this post. But for those of you who are involved in the custody issue, it’s important to know about the attacks on activists that are happening.

For over a decade I have been one of the leaders in the international effort to secure full human rights for protective mothers and their children. There is no cause that remains as close to my heart day in and day out.

I am writing in response to the ongoing controversy on the web regarding the Protective Mothers Alliance (PMA), a grassroots advocacy organization that I helped to co-found and that is directed by Janice Levinson. I have been following the claims that have been made about PMA and about Janice; specifically, I have had the opportunity to review communications that have been shared between Janice and other individuals, and to see some of the extremely negative postings that have been made. In my opinion, the attacks that have been made on Janice and on PMA have to be called out for what they are: vicious, dishonest, threatening, and dehumanizing written assaults on a committed advocate and survivor, one who has worked tirelessly for the interests and rights of protective mothers and their children.

There are a number of sources of these attacks, but they come overwhelmingly from Claudine Dombrowski and the American Mothers Political Party (AMPP). I am not relying on Janice’s word in forming this conclusion; I have looked at many postings by Claudine Dombrowski and AMPP, and they are cruel, irresponsible, and outrageous. And they don’t stop; in fact, they’re getting worse over time.

Moreover, Claudine Dombrowski and AMPP have begun to attack a significant number of other protective mothers and their allies as well, with similar viciousness. The predictable effect of the movement’s reluctance to denounce this behavior is that it is growing and spreading.

To make sure that there is no doubt or confusion, I want to state that I give my wholehearted support to PMA and Janice Levinson. PMA has been an important and exciting development in the custody rights movement, and Janice Levinson’s work in organizing protective mothers has been excellent. I have found her to be a person of the highest integrity and commitment, combined with a deep commitment to treating participants with fairness and respect. Although she has been accused of various things, I cannot find a shred of truth to any of these accusations, and none of the accusations come from any source that I find in any way credible.

The accusations that have been made about PMA have been insulting and derisive in their tone, and have involved outright fabrications about the organization and how it works, and about Janice herself. There have also been accusations that Janice’s work is not actually associated with me, which is as bizarre as the other attacks. The attackers have used gutter language, have put up photos of Janice, and have written what can only be interpreted as threats against her. These behaviors serve to further discredit those who are making claims about PMA. These behaviors appear to come from just two or three disgruntled individuals who were angry about the appropriate requirements that the PMA structure involves, and who chose to retaliate in harmful and divisive ways.

Now for the most important part of this letter:

Claudine Dombrowski and AMPP are doing severe damage to the custody rights movement. Whatever their intentions may be, the actual effects of their actions is only to strengthen the position of the abusers. I have known of a number of individuals who have dropped out of the movement and/or who have declared that they won’t come to the BMCC anymore because they can’t stand the infighting and accusations, which are almost all traceable to the same few sources. I therefore have decided today — after viewing the latest round of unbelievable psychological assaults on Janice (see, for example, janicelevinson.blogspot.com, a blog that was created just to attack and humiliate Janice) — that I am taking the following stands:

1) I will not participate in any event or campaign that Claudine Dombrowski or AMPP are officially connected to.

2) I will not attend any event where Claudine Dombrowski and AMPP are present unless the organizers of the event have done everything in their power to keep them from attending.

3) I won’t work on any projects or collaborate with anyone who has worked with Claudine Dombrowski or AMPP in the past unless they now publicly and visibly denounce her actions.

I have waited some four years to take these steps, but now I regret that I waited so long. We cannot fight against the power and actions of abusers, and of the courts that enable them, while we remain silent and acquiescent in the face of severely abusive of treatment of our own allies.

Whatever divisiveness may result from drawing a line that places Claudine Dombrowski and AMPP outside of the custody rights movements will be far less than the divisiveness and other damage that are resulting from our failure to draw that line. So the movement needs us to take this stand.

But there is an even more important reason to take this stand, which is that it’s the right thing to do.

I ask that you not stand by quietly and allow Janice to be dragged through the mud. Please look at the attacks that have been made on her (and at the lack of any similar behavior coming from her). And then please inform everyone in your networks that you are denouncing the behavior of Claudine Dombrowski and the AMPP and that you do not intend to have them be part of the custody rights / protective mothers movement.

You can also help by complaining to Google about the hate-oriented website created against Janice, by going to:
https://support.google.com/blogger/answer/82111?id&url

Healing and Hope
lundybancroft.blogspot.com

Bill Windsor drafts lawsuit against the American Mothers Political Party and its members, including Claudine Dombrowski, Lorraine Tipton, Jennifer Dotson, Shannon E. Miller, Kimberly Wigglesworth, Connie Bedwell, and Loryn Ryder

2013-07-17-Kansas-Topeka-Shawnee-County-Courthouse (1)-640w

Bill Windsor has drafted a lawsuit against the American Mothers Political Party and its members, including Claudine Dombrowski, Lorraine Tipton, Jennifer Dotson, Shannon E. Miller, Kimberly Wigglesworth, Connie Bedwell, and Loryn Ryder.  The lawsuit is to be filed at the Shawnee County Courthouse in Topeka, Kansas.  Tipton (Wisconsin), Dotson (Florida), Miller (Mississippi), Wigglesworth (Connecticut), Bedwell (California, and Ryder (Ohio) will all have to come to Kansas to participate.

I have carefully studied Kansas statutes, and I have identified the causes of action.  I have a lot of evidence, with screenshots of published statements by each of these woman and entire downloads of the website and Facebook page for the American Mothers Political Party.

This has not yet been filed, but I plan to file it as soon as possible.  Because these women are such supporters of the American Mothers Political Party, which is headquartered here in Topeka Kansas, I believe Tipton, Dotson, Miller, Wigglesworth, Bedwell, and Ryder will all have to come here.  With all the hearings and discovery that will be done, we will all be spending a lot of time in Topeka.

COUNT I – DEFAMATION

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. In Kansas, the elements of defamation, both libel and slander, are: (1) false and defamatory words (2) communicated to a third person (3) which result in harm to the reputation of the person defamed.  An organization may be liable for the defamatory utterances of its agent which are made while acting within the scope of her authority.
  3. Defendants have published false and defamatory words about the Plaintiff. [Element 1.]  Published statements were false.  Many statements are mentioned above and may be seen in exhibits.  The Plaintiff believes much more will surface in discovery.
  4. Statements that Defendants have published were communicated to third persons. [Element 2.]  Many statements have been published online for the world to see.
  5. Statements made by Defendants have harmed the reputation of Plaintiff and have lowered him in the estimation of the community or to defer third persons from associating or dealing with him.  [Element 3.]  Many people have ceased dealing with the Plaintiff because of the statements.
  6. Defendants know the difference between what’s true and what’s a lie.  They know about laws to protect people from libel, slander, defamation, harassment, and stalking, but they acted anyway.  They had a duty to abide by the law, and they didn’t ignore it once; the laws were ignored again and again and again.
  7. The Plaintiff suffered damage as a result of statements by Defendants. The Plaintiff has lost his wife, his relationship with his children, and any contact whatsoever with his grandchildren.  He has lost his home.  His movie project has been severely hurt by what the Defendants have done.  His reputation has been tarnished almost beyond belief.  The Plaintiff has incurred costs and lost money as a result of the actions of the Defendants.

COUNT II – DEFAMATION PER SE

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. Statements made by Defendants impute the commission of crimes or acts that constitute an indictable offense.  Many statements made have accused the Plaintiff of criminal acts.
  3. Many statements made by Defendants impute fraud, misconduct, or incompetence in the Plaintiff’s business or occupation.
  4. Statements made by Defendants tend to harm the reputation of Plaintiff and to lower him in the estimation of the community or to defer third persons from associating or dealing with him.  Many people have ceased dealing with the Plaintiff because of the statements.
  5. Statements made by the Defendants were defamatory as a matter of law.

COUNT III – OUTRAGE AND INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. The tort of outrage or intentional infliction of emotional distress has four elements: (1) The conduct of defendant must be intentional or in reckless disregard of plaintiff; (2) the conduct must be extreme and outrageous; (3) there must be a causal connection between defendant’s conduct and plaintiff’s mental distress; and (4) plaintiff’s mental distress must be extreme and severe.
  3. Defendants intentionally or negligently inflicted emotional distress on the Plaintiff.  Defendants acted intentionally or recklessly. [Element 1.]  Defendants know the difference between what’s true and what’s a lie.  They know about laws to protect people from libel, slander, defamation, harassment, and stalking, but they acted anyway.  They had a duty to abide by the law, the they didn’t ignore it once, the laws were ignored again and again and again.
  4. Conduct of Defendants was extreme and outrageous. [Element 2.]  These outrageously false, criminal claims would prompt an average member of the community to exclaim “outrageous!”
  5. The conduct of Defendants caused the distress. [Element 3.]
  6. The distress caused was severe emotional distress to the Plaintiff.  [Element 4.]  The outrageous lies, libel, slander, and defamation are bad alone, but the effect on the Plaintiff’s life with the loss of his wife, his family, his home, and life as he knew it has caused severe emotional distress.

COUNT IV – NEGLIGENCE

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. Defendants were negligent.  Negligence is the failure to exercise the degree of care which a reasonably prudent and careful person would use under the same or similar circumstances.
  3. The elements of a negligence claim are (1) The existence of a duty on the part of the defendant to protect the plaintiff from the injury of which he complains; (2) an act or omission in breach of that duty, (3) An injury to the plaintiff from such failure of the defendant, and (4) an injury.
  4. The Defendants had a duty to abide by the laws regarding defamation, cyberstalking, harassment, libel, slander, and they ignored that duty.  Harm was clearly forseeable.  Duty, the obligation of one person to another, flows from millennia of social customs, philosophy, and religion. Serving as the glue of society, duty is the thread that binds humans to one another in community. Duty constrains and channels behavior in a socially responsible way.  The Defendants did not behave in a socially responsible way.  Their actions were totally irresponsible.
  5. There is a standard of proper behavior necessary to avoid imposing undue risks of harm to other persons and their property, and the Defendants breached their duty.  They ignored the behavior necessary to avoid harming the Plaintiff.  They thumbed their noses at the law and the Plaintiff with one blatant slanderous statement after another.  The Defendants had a duty to act with reasonable care for the safety the Plaintiff.  The Defendants acted carelessly, unreasonably, without due care.  The Defendants breached the duty of care, and their conduct was negligent.
  6. The damages the Plaintiff suffers are a proximate result of the Defendants’ breach of duty.  The Defendants must be required to compensate the Plaintiff for harm improperly inflicted.  How do you compensate the Plaintiff for the loss of his wife, his children, and his grandchildren?  As much as money damages can do so, the law requires the Defendants to restore what the Plaintiff lost as a proximate result of the Defendants’ wrongs.
  7. The Plaintiff has been caused pain and suffering, emotional distress, lost enjoyment of life, loss of his marriage, loss of his relationship with his family, loss of his home, severe damage to his reputation, damage to his career, and more.

COUNT V – TORTIOUS INTERFERENCE WITH CONTRACT

OR BUSINESS RELATIONS

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. Tortious interference with a contract or business expectancy requires proof of: (1) a contract or valid business relationship; (2) defendant’s knowledge of the contract or relationship; (3) a breach induced or caused by defendant’s intentional interference; (4) absence of justification; and (5) damages resulting therefrom.
  3. The Plaintiff was involved in a valid business relationship. [Element 1.]  The Defendants knew that the Plaintiff had a valid business relationship with people all over America in filming videos, conducting interviews, and producing a movie.  Several of the Defendants signed a contract with the Plaintiff, and they were aware that everyone filmed by the Plaintiff signed the same contract.
  4. Defendants were aware of the relationship. [Element 2.]  The Defendants were totally aware of the business relationship that the Plaintiff has had with thousands of people.
  5. Defendants intentionally interfered with the relationship. [Element 3.]  Defendants know the difference between what’s true and what’s a lie.  They know about laws to protect people from libel, slander, defamation, harassment, and stalking, but they acted anyway.  They had a duty to abide by the law, the they didn’t ignore it once, the laws were ignored again and again and again.  They took actions to damage the Plaintiff’s business relationships.
  6. Defendants acted without justification. [Element 4.]  There can never be a justification for lies, libel, slander, harassment, defamation, and false criminal charges.
  7. The Plaintiff suffered damages as a direct result of conduct of Defendants. [Element 5.]  Many people have dropped out of the Plaintiff’s projects.  Very few people contact the Plaintiff now while many thousands did before this.  The Plaintiff had over 50,000 followers on Facebook before this, and now he has less than 100.  The Defendants caused this.

COUNT VI – FALSE LIGHT INVASION OF PRIVACY

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. The right to privacy is invaded when there is (1) publication of some kind is made to a third party; (2) the publication  falsely represents the person; and (3) that representation is highly offensive to a reasonable person.  This is a cause of action based upon injury to plaintiff’s emotions and his mental suffering.
  3. Defendants have given publicity to matters concerning the Plaintiff.
  4. Defendants have invaded the Plaintiff’s privacy.  The Plaintiff’s name has been misappropriated as has the name of his deceased parents.  The Plaintiff’s photos and intellectual property have been misappropriated many times.
  5. Private facts about the Plaintiff have been publicly disclosed, and totally false personal information has been publicly disclosed.  Facts disclosed include alleged sex life, alleged criminal activity, alleged failure to pay taxes, alleged pedophilia, and much more.  There is an absolutely false article on Business Week’s website posted by Dombrowski that claims the Plaintiff is a sexual deviant.  The Plaintiff’s personal photos, photos of family members, as well as photos and alleged photos of his family have been published to damage the Plaintiff and in violation of his privacy and intellectual property rights. The matters publicized would be offensive to a reasonable person.  The disclosures have humiliated the Plaintiff.
  6. The Plaintiff has been portrayed in an absolutely false light to the public.

COUNT VII – CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT DEFAMATION

  1. The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.
  2. The elements for civil conspiracy under Kansas law are: (1) Two or more persons; (2) an object to be accomplished; (3) a meeting of minds on the object or course of action; (4) one or more unlawful overt acts; and (5) damages as the proximate result thereof.
  3. Defendants conspired to defame the Plaintiff.
  4. Defendants formed and operated the conspiracy.  The object to be accomplished was to defame, libel, slander, harass, cyberstalk, falsely charge the Plaintiff with felonies, cause emotional distress, and damage the Plaintiff.  Evidence shows that Defendants had a meeting of the minds and actively worked together toward this objective.
  5. Multiple overt acts were committed.  A substantial act or substantial effect from the conspiracy occurred in Kansas.  Defendants knew of the acts to be committed in Kansas and the impact in Kansas of acts done elsewhere in furtherance of the conspiracy.  The act in, and effect on, Kansas was a direct and foreseeable result of the conduct in furtherance of the conspiracy.
  6. Damage resulted to the Plaintiff from acts done in furtherance of the common design.  The Plaintiff has been caused pain and suffering, emotional distress, lost enjoyment of life, loss of his marriage, loss of his relationship with his family, loss of his home, severe damage to his reputation, damage to his career, and more.  The Plaintiff’s business relationships have been severely damaged.  The Plaintiff’s reputation is now sullied by a massive amount of absolutely false, defamatory information online.  This defamation likely can never be erased because it is breeding in cyberspace.

PUNITIVE DAMAGES

45.          The facts in paragraphs 21-65 are incorporated herein.

46.          The Defendants acted intentionally to damage the Plaintiff.  This isn’t the case of someone slipping up and making one false statement.  The actions of the Defendants were deliberate.  Defendants’ conduct as described above is willful, wanton, wicked, intentional, and malicious resulting from fraud, insult, and malice, and it is associated with aggravating circumstances, including willfulness, wantonness, malice, oppression, outrageous conduct, insult, and fraud, thus warranting the Plaintiff’s recovery of punitive damages from the Defendants, to be determined by the trier of fact.  The Plaintiff should receive an award of punitive damages.  Exemplary damages serve to provide the claimant with recovery above and beyond compensatory damages in order to punish the wrongdoer for egregious conduct and to deter the wrongdoer and others from similar conduct in the future. Since the Plaintiff’s damages can never be erased in this case; there is no amount of money that could compensate the Plaintiff for the loss of the loves of his life, his wife, children, and grandchildren; there is no amount of money to compensate a decent, honest, law-abiding citizen for the destruction of his reputation.

JURY TRIAL

Plaintiff demands a jury trial.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that the Defendants be cited to appear and answer, and that on final trial, Plaintiff has the following:

  1. Judgment against Defendants for economic, pecuniary, lost profits, consequential, and incidental damages in an amount greater than $75,000 and the jurisdictional limits of the Court;
  2. By reason of Defendants’ knowing and intentional conduct, mental anguish damages in an amount within the jurisdictional limits of the Court;
  3. Prejudgment interest as provided by law;
  4. Exemplary and punitive damages appropriate to deter any future willful conduct;
  5. Attorney’s fees;
  6. Costs of suit;
  7. Post-judgment interest as provided by law;
  8. An Order that Defendants remove all false information regarding Plaintiff from the Internet;
  9. An Order that Defendants retract all false statements made by Defendants regarding Plaintiff;
  10. An Order that Defendants cease all false statements regarding Plaintiff; and
  11. Such other and further relief to which Plaintiff may be justly entitled.

Submitted this 18th day of July, 2013,

_________________________

William M. Windsor

514 America’s Way #4841 * Box Elder, SD 57719-7600

Email: nobodies@att.net, Phone: 770-578-1094, Fax: 770-234-4106

Claudine Dombrowski has been located in Topeka, Kansas, and evidence and witnesses are mounting against her for a variety of crimes and wrongdoing

2013-07-17-Kansas-Topeka-Claudine-Dombrowski-Residences (1)-640w

Claudine Dombrowski has been located in Topeka, Kansas, and evidence and witnesses are mounting against Claudine Dombrowski for a variety of crimes and wrongdoing.

I have determined that Claudine Dombrowski works at Gosser’s Auto Electric, 2001 SE 6th Avenue, Topeka, KS 66604, and I have been advised that Claudine Dombrowski has lived at Park South Apartments, 3711 Park South Court, Topeka, KS 66609.

Gosser’s Auto Electric was one of the “home” addresses I obtained on Claudine Dombrowski through Spokeo.

The phone started ringing bright and early this morning with information about Claudine Dombrowski.

It seems Claudine Dombrowski may be one giant fraud.  It seems Claudine Dombrowski attacks just about anyone who crosses her and her path.  I have been told that Claudine Dombrowski appears to have faked injuries using makeup.  I have been told that her own daughter, who Claudine Dombrowski cries on camera about not being able to hold for 13 years, filed a petition seeking a stalking protective order against her.  The daughter also had her name legally changed to eliminate the Dombrowski.  There are other criminal charges pending against Claudine Dombrowski here in Topeka, and the District Attorney has the file.

I have been advised that Claudine Dombrowski‘s loss of custody and limited visitation was totally proper.  I understand Claudine Dombrowski published photos of her daughter online as well as her psychiatric records.  I am told that Claudine Dombrowski attended one court hearing and handed out photos of the children of one of the attorneys involved.  I am told that I will be receiving emails where Claudine Dombrowski told another attorney that she bought a gun using the attorney’s stolen credit card information.  I am told that this attorney received a death threat as well as a message saying that the attorney’s daughter needed to be raped.  I am told that another local attorney received death threats from Claudine Dombrowskii as well.

These are all things that I was told.  I am scheduling a meeting with the other victims to get their stories and see their evidence.

Here are some of the cases involving Claudine Dombrowski:

Case

Name

  

Role

02TR008111 -DOMBROWSKI,CLAUDINE,, 1D
04L 006795 -DOMBROWSKI,CLAUDINE,, 1D
05L 019654 -DOMBROWSKI,CLAUDINE,, 1D
10TR000190 -DOMBROWSKI,CLAUDINE,, 1D
96D 000217 -DOMBROWSKI,CLAUDINE,, 1OE
96D 000217 -DOMBROWSKI,CLAUDINE,, 2OR
96D 000217 -DOMBROWSKI,CLAUDINE,, 1D
03C 000086 -DOMBROWSKI,CLAUDINE,,TRACT 84, 187D
04L 006034 -DOMBROWSKI,CLAUDINE,M, 1D

Claudine Dombrowski was divorced from Halleck (Hal) Richardson in Shawnee County District Count in 1997.  Attorney Donald R. Hoffman.  Guardian ad Litem (GAL), Jill Dykes.

Birthdate: April 10, 1966, unless she lies about that, too.

Aliases: Claudine Marie Dombrowski, Claudine M Montgomery, Claudine M Richardson, Claudine Montgomery, Claudine Yockers

Relatives: Kathy Richardson, David Montgomery, Hal Richardson, Hal George Richardson, Halleck Richardson, Jennifer Dombrowski, Brian Montgomery, Daniel Montgomery, David Montgomery

Here are some articles with information about Claudine Dombrowski.

http://lawlessamerica.org/?p=49

http://lawlessamerica.org/?p=60

http://lawlessamerica.org/?p=41

http://lawlessamerica.org/?p=38

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1258:bill-windsor-has-been-attacked-by-shannon-e-miller-the-american-mothers-political-party-facebook-and-more&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1259:american-mothers-political-party-launches-boycott-of-lawless-americathe-movie&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1264:american-mothers-political-party-announces-that-there-will-be-no-lawless-america-movie&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1262:american-mothers-political-party-page-should-be-closed-by-facebook-after-charges-of-being-a-hate-site&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1257:bill-windsor-has-been-attacked-by-shannon-e-miller-the-american-mothers-political-party-facebook-and-more&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1274:sundance-film-festival-will-lawless-americathe-movie-be-banned-&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1286:bill-windsor-of-lawless-america-announces-plan-for-combatting-liars-and-cyberstalkers&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1371:elizabeth-hope-hernandez-to-be-charged-with-new-crimes-in-mississippi&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

http://www.lawlessamerica.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1339:bill-windsor-has-filed-criminal-complaints-against-allie-overstreet-sean-boushie-claudine-dombrowski-elizabeth-hope-hernandez-kimberly-wigglesworth-and-brannon-bridge&catid=133:lawless-america-the-movie&Itemid=105

I am here in Topeka waiting for a judge to act on my Petition for a Stalking Protective Order.  Looks like I will be busy.

Claudine Dombrowski runs around pretending to be an important leader in the fight for battered women.  It appears to me that she is a batterer; she batters with the Internet and with harassment of innocent people, including her own child.

Here are IP addresses that have been used by Claudine Dombrowski:

173.194.64.132 is used for the following:  Shawneecourtwhores.blogspot.com; Angelzfury.blogspot.com; Thetruthaboutthefamilycourt.blogspot.com; Ncmbts.blogspot.com; Drmilfredbuddale.blogspot.com; Mjilldykes.blogspot.com; Renemetherton.blogspot.com; Jasonphoffman.blogspot.com

74.200.243.251 is used for: Angelzfury.wordpress.com

184.106.20.99 is used for: Battermothersjustice.posterous.com

72.233.2.58 is used for: Mamaliberty.wordpress.com

195.170.168.1 is used for: Justiceformothers.blog.com

Cyberstalker Claudine Dombrowski’s “homes” in Topeka Kansas

Kansas-Wichita-Claudine-Dombrowski-Lawless-America-Movie-2012-10-30 293-cropped-640w

Cyberstalker Claudine Dombrowski‘s “homes” in Topeka Kansas.

Claudine Dombrowski doesn’t want her address known.  Claudine Dombrowski claims it is because she is a battered mother.  I don’t know if that’s true.  What I do know is that by hiding, the police and the courts haven’t been able to find Claudine Dombrowski.

This was identified as a problem at both the Topeka Police Department and the Shawnee County Courthouse.  So, I made special arrangements to obtain photography from each address that Spokeo has for Claudine Dombrowski.  And here they are.

Bill Windsor visited the Topeka Kansas Police Headquarters where he filed criminal charges against Claudine Dombrowski

2013-07-17-Kansas-Topeka-City-of-Topeka-Police-Department (8)-640w

Bill Windsor visited the Topeka Kansas Police Headquarters where he filed criminal charges against Claudine Dombrowski.

I was well received by Sergeant Wing of the City of Topeka Police Department.  He took a lengthy report.  The case was assigned number 15689-13.

Video Report of Bill Windsor from the Topeka Kansas Police Department after filing criminal charges against Claudine Dombrowski.

I need to stay in Topeka for a day or two as there are law enforcement people here who may want to meet with me.

 

 

Bill Windsor visited the Shawnee County Courthouse in Topeka Kansas where he filed for a Stalking Protective Order against Claudine Dombrowski

California-Los-Angeles-Group-lobby-william-2012-09-28-cropped-tight-edited-640w

Bill Windsor visited the Shawnee County Courthouse in Topeka Kansas where he filed for a Stalking Protective Order against Claudine Dombrowski.

I filed close to 70-pages with my report.  This will now be presented to a judge, and he will decide whether he will (a) issue an ex parte protective order temporarily, or (b) decide at a trial that will be set up here after Claudine Dombrowski gets served.

Claudine Dombrowski has a reputation at the courthouse, and it isn’t a good one….

Bill Windsor’s Video Report on filing for a Stalking Protective Order against Claudine Dombrowski and the American Mothers Political Party.

 

Claudine Dombrowski has been exposed as a liar and a hypocrite as well as a Cyberstalker with many victims

Kansas-Wichita-Lawless-America-Movie-2012-10-30 290-cropped-square-200w

Claudine Dombrowski has been exposed as a liar and a hypocrite as well as a Cyberstalker with many victims.

Claudine Dombrowski feigns outrage when she sees me post a couple of criminal’s addresses.

Look at what she does to people she doesn’t like:

Rene M. Netherton

Rene Netherton Court Appointed Child Abuser

Donald R. Hoffman

Scott D . Mckenzie, GAL Topeka KS

Jill Dykes, GAL

M. Jill Dykes GAL – The Witch that Flew Off her Broom Stick

Christopher Dykes

Dr. Richard B.Maxfield

Dr. Milfred ‘Bud’ Dale

David C Rodeheffer PhD Topeka KS

Kara Haney, LSCW Topeka Kansas

Drex Flott LSCW, Topeka, Kansas

Hal Richardson Wife Beater Topeka Kansas

Hal Richardson — Minuteman Solar Film

Hal Richardson again

Bill Windsor, Sexual Deviant

Janice Levinson

Rene M. Netherton again

Claudine Dombrowski uses the screen name Petunia Pigg – Here’s proof.

Claudine Dombrowski Congressional Testimony to the fake Movie Lawless America and CON MAN Bill Windsor

Claudine Dombrowski Congressional Testimony to the fake Movie Lawless America and CON MAN Bill Windsor on Vimeo

Many articles about Claudine Dombrowski and similar “things”

Claudine Dombrowski Contact Information

Date of Birth: April 10, 1966

Aliases: Claudine Marie Dombrowski, Claudine M Montgomery, Claudine M Richardson, Claudine Montgomery, Claudine Yockers

Relatives: Kathy Richardson, David Montgomery, Hal Richardson, Hal George Richardson, Halleck Richardson, Jennifer Dombrowski, Brian Montgomery, Daniel Montgomery, David Montgomery

Claudine Dombrowski: Holocaust Hypocrite